THE HARRIS POLL® #6, January 30, 2002

Big Increases in Confidence in Military Leaders, the White House and the Federal Government Lift "Harris Interactive Confidence Index" to Highest Level Since 1973

Index rises to 65 for first time since Watergate and Vietnam War
_________________________________________________

by Humphrey Taylor

Americans feel better about their leaders than they have for a very long time. Every year at this time, The Harris Poll® measures the confidence that the American people have in the leaders of fourteen institutions, and computes the Harris Interactive Confidence Index based on all the replies. This year the Confidence Index has surged to 65, compared to 55 last year, 60 in 1999 and only 42 in 1997. This is the highest level of confidence we have found in the twenty-nine years since 1973 when the Index stood at 69. Indeed, this is only the second time since Harris Interactive first asked these questions in 1966 (when the Index stood at 100) that the Index has been higher than 64. However, these questions were not asked between 1966 and 1971, five years which saw a huge drop in confidence from the high level of 1966.

These are the results of a Harris InteractiveSM survey of 1,011 adults surveyed by telephone between January 16–21, 2002.

The large increase in the Index this year is mainly a result of three big changes:

  • Those with a great deal of confidence in military leaders have surged from 44% last year to fully 71% now, by far their best score ever.
  • Those with a great deal of confidence in the White House have more than doubled from 21% last year to 50% now.
  • Those with a great deal of confidence in the Executive Branch of the federal government have increased from 20% to 33% in the last twelve months.

More modest increases occurred this year in those with a great deal of confidence in:

  • The Supreme Court, up from 35% to 41%.
  • The Congress, up from 18% to 22%.
  • The Press, up from 13% to 16%; and
  • Law firms, up from 10% to 13%.

However, several categories of leaders have slipped modestly since last year:

  • Leaders in medicine, down from 32% (and 44% in 2000) to 29% now, their lowest rating in five years.
  • Leaders on Wall Street, down from 23% to 19%, their lowest rating in four years.
  • Leaders in major companies, down from 20% to 16%, their lowest rating in nine years since 1993; and
  • Organized labor, down from 15% to 11%, their lowest rating in five years.

How the decade – so far – compares with other decades

The average Confidence Index for the first three years of this decade (so far, 2000–2002) is 60, which compares with 48 in the 1990s, 51 in the 1980s, and 57 in the 1970s. There was only one measure in the 1960s, in 1966, when the Index stood at 100.

Humphrey Taylor is the chairman of The Harris Poll®, Harris Interactive.

TABLE 1
CONFIDENCE IN LEADERS OF INSTITUTIONS NOW

"As far as people in charge of running (READ EACH ITEM) are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them?"

Great Deal

Only Some

Hardly Any

Not Sure/ Refused

The military

%

71

25

3

1

The White House

%

50

40

7

3

Congress

%

22

64

10

3

The executive branch of the federal government

%

33

53

9

4

The U.S. Supreme Court

%

41

45

11

3

Major educational institutions such as colleges and universities

%

33

51

14

2

Television news

%

24

53

22

2

Medicine

%

29

47

21

3

Wall Street

%

19

54

18

10

Major companies

%

16

56

24

3

Organized religion

%

23

46

24

6

The press

%

16

51

31

1

Organized labor

%

11

55

27

7

Law firms

%

13

49

33

5

TABLE 2-A
CONFIDENCE IN LEADERS OF INSTITUTIONS (1966-1989)

"As far as people in charge of running (READ EACH ITEM) are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them?"

Those with a great deal of confidence in:

1966

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

The Military

61

27

35

40

33

24

23

27

29

29

Medicine

73

61

48

57

50

43

42

43

42

30

The U.S. Supreme Court

50

23

28

33

40

28

22

29

29

28

Major educational institutions such as colleges & universities

61

37

33

44

40

36

31

37

41

33

Organized religion

41

27

30

36

32

32

24

29

24

20

Television news

x

x

x

41

31

35

28

28

35

37

Major companies

55

27

27

29

21

19

16

20

22

18

Wall Street

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

The White House

x

x

x

18

28

x

11

31

14

15

The executive branch of the federal government

41

23

27

19

28

13

11

23

14

17

The press

29

18

18

30

25

26

20

18

23

28

Congress

42

19

21

x

18

13

9

17

10

18

Organized labor

22

14

15

20

18

14

10

14

15

10

Law firms

x

x

x

24

18

16

12

14

18

16

HARRIS INTERACTIVE

CONFIDENCE INDEX

100

58

59

69

64

55

44

55

55

50

Those with a great deal of confidence in:

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

The Military

28

28

31

35

45

32

36

35

33

32

Medicine

34

37

32

35

43

39

33

36

40

30

The U.S. Supreme Court

27

29

25

33

35

28

32

30

32

28

Major educational institutions such as colleges & universities

36

34

30

36

40

35

34

36

34

32

Organized religion

22

22

20

22

24

21

22

16

17

16

Television news

29

24

24

24

28

23

27

29

28

25

Major companies

16

16

18

18

19

17

16

21

19

16

Wall Street

12

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

8

The White House

18

28

20

23

42

30

19

23

17

20

The executive branch of the federal government

17

24

x

x

x

19

18

19

16

17

The press

19

16

14

19

18

16

19

19

18

18

Congress

18

16

13

20

28

16

21

20

15

16

Organized labor

14

12

8

10

12

13

11

11

13

10

Law firms

13

x

x

12

17

12

14

15

13

x

HARRIS INTERACTIVE CONFIDENCE INDEX

49

51

46

53

63

51

51

53

50

46

________________
X = Not asked.

TABLE 2-B
CONFIDENCE IN LEADERS OF INSTITUTIONS (1990-2002)

"As far as people in charge of running (READ EACH ITEM) are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them?"

Those with a great deal of confidence in:

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

The Military

43

47

50

57

39

43

47

37

44

54

48

44

71

The White House

21

21

16

23

18

13

15

15

20

22

21

21

50

The U.S. Supreme Court

32

23

30

26

31

32

31

28

37

42

34

35

41

Major educational institutions such as colleges and universities

35

21

25

23

25

27

30

27

37

37

36

35

33

The executive branch of the federal government

14

X

13

15

12

9

12

12

17

17

18

20

33

Medicine

35

X

29

22

23

26

29

29

38

39

44

32

29

Television news

27

20

22

23

20

16

21

18

26

23

20

24

24

Congress

12

9

10

12

8

10

10

11

12

12

15

18

22

Organized religion

20

X

x

x

x

24

x

20

25

27

26

25

23

Wall Street

9

9

12

13

15

13

17

17

18

30

30

23

19

Major companies

14

15

11

16

19

21

21

18

21

23

28

20

16

The press

18

14

13

15

13

11

14

11

14

15

13

13

16

Law firms

X

X

11

11

8

9

11

7

11

10

12

10

13

Organized labor

14

X

X

x

x

8

x

9

13

15

15

15

11

HARRIS INTERACTIVE CONFIDENCE INDEX

50

45

45

47

43

43

47

42

54

60

59

55

65

X = Not asked.

TABLE 3
CONFIDENCE IN INSTITUTIONS; AVERAGE FOR INDEX IN EACH DECADE

 

1960s

1970s

1980s

1990s

2000s

         

1980

49

1990

50

2000

59

     

1971

58

1981

51

1991

45

2001

55

     

1972

59

1982

46

1992

45

2002

65

     

1973

69

1983

53

1993

47

   
     

1974

64

1984

63

1994

43

   
     

1975

55

1985

51

1995

43

   
 

1966

100

1976

44

1986

51

1996

47

   
     

1977

55

1987

53

1997

42

   
     

1978

55

1988

50

1998

54

   
     

1979

50

1989

46

1999

60

   

AVERAGE FOR DECADE

 

100

 

57

 

51

 

48

 

60

Methodology

The Harris Poll® was conducted by telephone within the United States between January 16–21, 2002 among a nationwide cross section of 1,011 adults. Figures for age, sex, race, education, number of adults and number of voice/telephone lines in the household were weighted where necessary to align them with their actual proportions in the population.

The Harris Interactive Confidence in Leadership Index measures changes in the public’s confidence in various institutions. It is derived in the following manner:

  1. The index is based on the mean value of the items asked.
  2. All items have equal weight.
  3. The year 1966, the first year the items were asked, was set as a reference year for the index and assigned a score of 100.
  4. In order to yield a score of 100 in 1966, the mean value of the original ten items was multiplied by a factor of 2.11. This same factor was then applied to the mean score in subsequent years, as long as the same items were asked.
  5. Whenever a new item is added, the multiplication factor is changed so that the new item has no effect on that year’s score. The new factor is derived by calculating the index with and without the new item(s), taking the ratio of the two scores, and multiplying this ratio by the old factor. (The current factor is 2.28).
  6. In years when an item included in a previous year is not asked, it is assumed for calculation purposes that no change has occurred in that item since the last time it was asked.

In theory, with a probability sample of this size, one can say with 95 percent certainty that the results have a statistical precision of plus or minus 3 percentage points of what they would be if the entire adult population had been polled with complete accuracy. Unfortunately, there are several other possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include refusals to be interviewed (non-response), question wording and question order, interviewer bias, weighting by demographic control data and screening (e.g., for likely voters). It is difficult or impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these factors.

These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.

____________________________________________________________

J15652
Q405



©2002, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited without the express written permission of Harris Interactive.



Print
Printer Friendly Version of this Release

Follow The Harris Poll on:
twitter

Subscribe to Over the Wire – Weblog commentary of research data on current events and social trends
Sign-up for Harris Poll Weekly
About The Harris Poll
The Harris Poll by Date
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Financial Times / Harris Poll
Search The Harris Poll Library
News Room
PRIVACYSURVEY DEMOESOMAR 26 QUESTIONSJOIN OUR PANELSITE MAPSEARCH

©2009 Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.