Large Majorities of U.S. Adults Continue to Think That Big
Companies, PACs, and Lobbyists Have Too Much Power and Influence in Washington
Large majorities also believe that small business, public
opinion, and nonprofit organizations have too little power and influence
ROCHESTER, N.Y. –December 1, 2005 – As scandals involving power and
influence continue to unfold in Washington, D.C., it is not surprising that the
American public thinks certain groups have too much power and influence in our
nation’s capital. By very large majorities, U.S. adults believe that big
companies (90%) and Political Action Committees, or PACs (85%). have too much
power and influence in Washington. Not far behind, three-quarters (74%) of
adults believe political lobbyists have too much power and influence, while
two-thirds (68%) feel this way about the news media.
Looking at this from the opposite perspective, 92 percent of U.S. adults
believe that small business has too little power and influence in Washington.
Large numbers also believe public opinion (78%) and nonprofit organizations
(67%) have too little power and influence.
These are some of the results of The Harris Poll®,
a nationwide study conducted by telephone by Harris Interactive®
among 1,011 U.S. adults between November 8 and 13, 2005.
There are two other institutions which majorities of the public believe have
too much power – trade associations (61%) and TV and radio talk shows (51%).
Conversely, over half of the public believes racial minorities (58%), churches
and religious groups (55%) and opinion polls (53%) all have too little power and
influence in Washington. Interestingly, the public seems to be split on labor
unions as 43 percent believe they have too much power and 46 percent believe
they have too little power.
Changes over time
In comparing this year to last year, there are two interesting things to
note. First, the top four institutions seen as having too much power have all
seen a rise in their numbers, with big companies seeing the largest increase –
from 83 percent in 2004 to 90 percent this year. Second, in looking at those who
are seen as having too little power, all of those repeated on our list, with the
exception of big companies and PACs, saw a rise in their numbers. Labor unions
saw the largest increase with 37 percent feeling they had too little power and
influence in 2004 compared to 46 percent this year.
When looking at the longer-term changes between 1994 and 2004, the biggest
changes are:
- An 11-point decline from 79 to 68 percent in those who think the news
media have too much power and influence.
- A 10-point decline from 38 to 28 percent in those who think that racial
minorities have too much power and influence.
- A five-point decline from 79 to 74 percent in those who think that
political lobbyists have too much power and influence.
- A four-point increase from 86 to 90 percent in those who think that big
companies have too much power.
- A four-point decline from 82 to 78 percent in those who think that public
opinion has too little influence.
Differences between the views of Republicans, Democrats and independents
On certain issues related to power and influence in Washington, Republicans,
Democrats and Independents tend to agree. Eighty-five percent or more of the
three groups believe that big companies and PACs have too much power and
influence. Furthermore, almost the same number of Republicans and Democrats (61%
and 60%, respectively) believe trade associations have too much power and
influence.
However, there are also some big differences. Republicans are much more
likely than Democrats to believe that labor unions have too much power (64% vs.
22%). They are also more likely to think that the news media (87% vs. 57%),
racial minorities (38% vs. 16%), opinion polls (44% vs. 24%) political lobbyists
(80% vs. 69%), TV and radio talk shows (60% vs. 50%), and nonprofit
organizations (27% vs. 17%) have too much power.
Democrats, on the other hand, are more likely than Republicans to think that
churches and religious organization (44% vs. 18%) have too much power.
TABLE 1
GROUPS SEEN AS HAVING TOO MUCH OR TOO LITTLE POWER AND
INFLUENCE IN WASHINGTON
"And now a question about the power of different groups
in influencing government policy, politicians, and policy makers in Washington.
Do you think (READ EACH ITEM) have/has too much or too little power and
influence in Washington?"
Base: All Adults
| |
|
Too Much |
Too Little |
About Right |
Not Sure/ Refused |
|
Big companies |
% |
90 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
|
Political action committees which give money to political candidates |
% |
85 |
10 |
1 |
3 |
|
Political lobbyists |
% |
74 |
17 |
2 |
7 |
|
The news media |
% |
68 |
23 |
5 |
4 |
|
Trade Associations |
% |
61 |
22 |
3 |
14 |
|
TV and radio talk shows |
% |
51 |
34 |
8 |
6 |
|
Labor unions |
% |
43 |
46 |
4 |
7 |
|
Churches & religious groups |
% |
35 |
55 |
5 |
4 |
|
Opinion polls |
% |
33 |
53 |
5 |
9 |
|
Racial minorities |
% |
28 |
58 |
7 |
6 |
|
Nonprofit organizations |
% |
23 |
67 |
5 |
6 |
|
Public opinion |
% |
16 |
78 |
3 |
3 |
|
Small business |
% |
4 |
92 |
2 |
3 |
Note: Percentages may not add up exactly to 100 percent due to rounding.
TABLE 2
GROUPS SEEN AS HAVING TOO MUCH POWER - TRENDS 1994-2004
"And now a question about the power of different groups
in influencing government policy, politicians, and policy makers in Washington.
Do you think (READ EACH ITEM) have/has too much or too little power and
influence in Washington?"
Percent saying "too much"
Base: All Adults
| |
|
1994 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Change Since 1994 |
|
Big companies |
% |
86 |
82 |
84 |
86 |
87 |
80 |
83 |
90 |
+4 |
|
Political action committees which give money to political candidates |
% |
88 |
83 |
83 |
83 |
83 |
78 |
81 |
85 |
-3 |
|
Political lobbyists |
% |
79 |
75 |
74 |
71 |
70 |
69 |
72 |
74 |
-5 |
|
The news media |
% |
79 |
81 |
77 |
77 |
72 |
72 |
71 |
68 |
-11 |
|
Trade Associations |
% |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
61 |
n/a |
|
TV and radio talk shows |
% |
51 |
54 |
54 |
57 |
47 |
54 |
54 |
51 |
- |
|
Labor unions |
% |
46 |
42 |
39 |
44 |
46 |
45 |
48 |
43 |
-3 |
|
Churches & religious groups |
% |
n/a |
n/a |
27 |
28 |
31 |
27 |
32 |
35 |
n/a |
|
Opinion polls |
% |
37 |
36 |
35 |
38 |
33 |
33 |
36 |
33 |
-4 |
|
Racial minorities |
% |
38 |
31 |
32 |
30 |
27 |
20 |
31 |
28 |
-10 |
|
Nonprofit organizations |
% |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
23 |
n/a |
|
Public opinion |
% |
14 |
21 |
15 |
14 |
15 |
19 |
18 |
16 |
+2 |
|
Small business |
% |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
- |
TABLE 3
GROUPS SEEN AS HAVING TOO LITTLE POWER - TRENDS 1994-2004
"And now a question about the power of different groups
in influencing government policy, politicians, and policy makers in Washington.
Do you think (READ EACH ITEM) have/has too much or too little power and
influence in Washington?"
Percent saying "too little"
Base: All Adults
| |
|
1994 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Change Since 1994 |
|
Big companies |
% |
9 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
10 |
9 |
5 |
-4 |
|
Political action committees which give money to political candidates |
% |
8 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
12 |
11 |
10 |
+2 |
|
Political lobbyists |
% |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
11 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
+4 |
|
Trade Associations |
% |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
22 |
n/a |
|
The news media |
% |
13 |
9 |
8 |
10 |
14 |
17 |
18 |
23 |
+10 |
|
TV and radio talk shows |
% |
37 |
29 |
24 |
23 |
29 |
29 |
28 |
34 |
-3 |
|
Labor unions |
% |
43 |
41 |
40 |
37 |
35 |
37 |
37 |
46 |
+3 |
|
Opinion polls |
% |
52 |
49 |
44 |
41 |
49 |
48 |
47 |
53 |
+1 |
|
Churches & religious groups |
% |
n/a |
n/a |
52 |
56 |
51 |
53 |
53 |
55 |
n/a |
|
Racial minorities |
% |
51 |
52 |
50 |
51 |
51 |
59 |
54 |
58 |
+7 |
|
Nonprofit organizations |
% |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
67 |
n/a |
|
Public opinion |
% |
82 |
74 |
74 |
73 |
75 |
69 |
72 |
78 |
-4 |
|
Small business |
% |
92 |
85 |
85 |
88 |
87 |
88 |
88 |
92 |
- |
TABLE 4
GROUPS SEEN AS HAVING TOO MUCH POWER – BY PARTY ID
"And now a question about the power of different groups
in influencing government policy, politicians, and policy makers in Washington.
Do you think . . . have/has too much or too little power and influence in
Washington?"
Percent saying "too much"
Base: All Adults
| |
All Adults |
Party ID |
Difference between Republicans and Democrats |
|
Republican |
Democrat |
Independent |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Big companies |
90 |
86 |
96 |
86 |
-10 |
|
Political action committee which give money to political candidates |
85 |
86 |
85 |
85 |
+1 |
|
Political lobbyists |
74 |
80 |
69 |
79 |
+11 |
|
The news media |
68 |
87 |
57 |
66 |
+30 |
|
Trade Associations |
61 |
61 |
60 |
61 |
+1 |
|
TV and radio talk shows |
51 |
60 |
50 |
48 |
+10 |
|
Labor unions |
43 |
64 |
22 |
49 |
+42 |
|
Churches and religious groups |
35 |
18 |
44 |
44 |
-26 |
|
Opinion polls |
33 |
44 |
24 |
36 |
+20 |
|
Racial minorities |
28 |
38 |
16 |
33 |
+22 |
|
Nonprofit organizations |
23 |
27 |
17 |
28 |
+10 |
|
Public opinion |
16 |
20 |
12 |
21 |
+8 |
|
Small business |
4 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
-3 |
Methodology
The Harris Poll® was conducted by telephone within the United
States between November 8 and 13, 2005 among a nationwide cross section of 1,011
adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race, education, number
of adults, number of voice/telephone lines in the household, region and size of
place were weighted where necessary to align them with their actual proportions
in the population.
In theory, with a probability sample of this size, one can say with 95
percent certainty that the overall results have a sampling error of plus or
minus 3 percentage points of what they would be if the entire U.S. adult
population had been polled with complete accuracy. Sampling error for the
sub-samples of Republicans (335), Democrats (311), and Independents (254) is
higher and varies. Unfortunately, there are several other possible sources of
error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than theoretical
calculations of sampling error. They include refusals to be interviewed (nonresponse),
question wording and question order, interviewer bias, weighting by demographic
control data and screening (e.g., for likely voters). It is impossible to
quantify the errors that may result from these factors.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National
Council on Public Polls.
J25890b
Q756 |