|
The Harris Poll® #19, February 24, 2006
Support for Government Surveillance Programs Increases among
U.S. Adults, but Many Still Worry About Civil Liberty Safeguards
Concern over terrorist threats has increased in the past year, and at the
same time, U.S. adults’ support for government surveillance programs has
increased. While a majority (57%) of U.S. adults feel U.S. law enforcement is
using its expanded surveillance powers in a proper way, many adults also express
concern over the security of civil liberty safeguards in the future.
Since September 2001, The Harris Poll® has tracked this
issue on seven separate occasions, and U.S. adults continue to show strong
support for tough surveillance measures. As the survey reveals, support has
increased since June 2005, possibly reflecting an increasing concern that there
will be a major terrorist attack in the United States.
These are the results of a nationwide Harris Poll of 1,016 U.S. adults
surveyed by telephone by Harris Interactive® between February 7 and
14, 2006.
Some of the key findings from this survey include:
- Two-thirds (66%) of U.S. adults think that it is very (17%) or somewhat
(49%) likely that there will be a major terrorist attack in the next 12
months. This is a significant increase from the 55 percent majority who felt
this way in June 2005.
- Overall, when it comes to the possibility of terrorist threats, a 57
percent majority of adults feel that U.S. law enforcement is using its
expanded surveillance powers in a proper way. While this is unchanged from
last June, the percentage of those who feel that the expanded powers are not
being used in a proper way has increased six percentage points since June to
40 percent. The percentage of those who say they are not sure has declined
from eight percent in June to a current three percent.
- Furthermore, 63 percent U.S. adults feel that the government’s
anti-terrorist programs have taken only a little or none of their own
personal privacy away. However, about one in seven (14%) feels the programs
have taken away quite a lot or a great deal of their own personal privacy,
while 23 percent feel they have lost a moderate amount.
In regard to the increased powers of investigation that law enforcement
agencies might use when dealing with people suspected of terrorist activity,
majorities of adults favor six out of the seven proposals that were measured in
this poll. The only proposal not receiving support from a majority of adults is
the expanded government monitoring of cell phones and emails to intercept
communications. Specifically, the survey finds that:
- Eighty-four percent of adults favor stronger document and physical
security checks for travelers, a slight increase from June’s 81 percent.
- Over eight in 10 (82%) adults favor expanded undercover activity to
penetrate groups under suspicion. This is up six percentage points from
June.
- Two-thirds (67%) favor expanded camera surveillance on streets and in
public places, which is up from the 59 percent in June.
- Two-thirds (66%) favor closer monitoring of banking and credit card
transactions to trace funding sources; up four points from June.
- About two-thirds (64%) favor adoption of a national I.D. system for all
U.S. citizens, up from 61 percent in June.
- Those who favor law enforcement monitoring of Internet discussions in chat
rooms and other forums has increased from 57 percent in June to a current 60
percent.
- Those who favor expanded government monitoring of cell phones and email to
intercept communications has increased to 44 percent. In June, 37 percent
favored this.
While large percentages do favor various tough surveillance measures and
assert that law enforcement is using its expanded powers in a proper way, many
continue to have reservations that judges, law enforcement agencies, Congress
and the White House may not safeguard these powers in hypothetical situations.
- Seventy-six percent of adults have moderate or high concern that judges
who authorize investigations will not look closely enough at the
justification of that surveillance.
- Three-quarters (75%) of adults have moderate or high concern that Congress
will not include adequate safeguards for civil liberties when authorizing
these increased powers.
- Seventy-five percent have moderate or high concern that the White House
will not issue proper rules for legal due process for government
surveillance programs. This represents a three-point increase from June
2005, when 72 percent expressed the same level of concern.
- Almost seven in 10 (68%) have moderate or high concern that law
enforcements agencies will investigate legitimate political and social
groups; unchanged from June.
Reflecting on these results, Dr. Alan F. Westin of Columbia University and
president of Privacy and American Business states: "The 76 percent of the
public who worries that judges will not look carefully enough into the
justifications for anti-terrorist surveillance operations, and the 75 percent
who expect Congress to set "adequate" civil liberties safeguards in
these operations seem to be an important trend-line result in relation to the
NSA’s warrantless surveillance program. It suggests to me that when Congress
holds its hearings into the NSA program, there will be heavy public support for
creating an updated process of judicial review for these surveillance
activities, as long as such a new process does not threaten to hamstring
effective monitoring."
TABLE 1
FAVOR/OPPOSE SEVEN PROPOSALS FOR INCREASED LAW ENFORCEMENT
POWERS
"Here are some increased powers of investigation that law
enforcement agencies might use when dealing with people suspected of terrorist
activity, which would also affect our civil liberties. For each, please say if
you would favor or oppose it."
Base: All Adults
| |
|
% |
Favor |
Oppose |
Not Sure/ Decline to Answer |
|
Stronger document and physical security checks for travelers |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
84 |
15 |
1 |
| |
June 2005 |
% |
81 |
17 |
2 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
83 |
14 |
3 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
84 |
14 |
1 |
|
Feb. 2003 |
% |
84 |
14 |
1 |
|
Mar. 2002 |
% |
89 |
9 |
2 |
|
Sept. 2001 |
% |
93 |
6 |
1 |
|
Expanded under-cover activities to penetrate groups under suspicion |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
82 |
17 |
1 |
| |
June 2005 |
% |
76 |
20 |
4 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
82 |
15 |
4 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
80 |
17 |
3 |
|
Feb. 2003 |
% |
81 |
17 |
2 |
|
Mar. 2002 |
% |
88 |
10 |
2 |
|
Sept. 2001 |
% |
93 |
5 |
1 |
|
Expanded camera surveillance on streets and in public places |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
67 |
32 |
1 |
| |
June 2005 |
% |
59 |
40 |
1 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
60 |
35 |
4 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
61 |
37 |
2 |
|
Feb. 2003 |
% |
61 |
37 |
1 |
|
Mar. 2002 |
% |
58 |
40 |
2 |
|
Sept. 2001 |
% |
63 |
35 |
2 |
|
Closer monitoring of banking and credit card transactions, to trace
funding sources |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
66 |
33 |
1 |
| |
June 2005 |
% |
62 |
35 |
3 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
67 |
30 |
4 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
64 |
34 |
3 |
|
Feb. 2003 |
% |
67 |
30 |
2 |
|
Mar. 2002 |
% |
72 |
25 |
2 |
|
Sept. 2001 |
% |
81 |
17 |
2 |
|
Adoption of a national I.D. system for all U.S. citizens |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
64 |
34 |
2 |
| |
June 2005 |
% |
61 |
34 |
5 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
60 |
33 |
6 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
56 |
37 |
2 |
|
Feb. 2003 |
% |
64 |
31 |
5 |
|
Mar. 2002 |
% |
59 |
37 |
5 |
|
Sept. 2001 |
% |
68 |
28 |
4 |
TABLE 1 (Continued)
| |
Favor |
Oppose |
Not Sure/ Decline to Answer |
|
Law enforcement monitoring of Internet discussions in chat rooms and
other forums |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
60 |
39 |
1 |
| |
June 2005 |
% |
57 |
40 |
4 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
59 |
37 |
5 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
50 |
45 |
6 |
|
Feb. 2003 |
% |
54 |
42 |
4 |
|
Mar. 2002 |
% |
55 |
41 |
4 |
|
Sept. 2001 |
% |
63 |
32 |
5 |
|
Expanded government monitoring of cell phones and email, to intercept
communications |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
44 |
55 |
1 |
| |
June 2005 |
% |
37 |
60 |
3 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
39 |
56 |
5 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
36 |
60 |
4 |
|
Feb. 2003 |
% |
44 |
53 |
4 |
|
Mar. 2002 |
% |
44 |
51 |
4 |
|
Sept. 2001 |
% |
54 |
41 |
4 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
TABLE 2
LEVELS OF CONCERN ABOUT FOUR POTENTIAL ABUSES OF POWER
"Now, here are some concerns that people might have about
the way these increased powers might be used by law enforcement. Would you say
you have high concern, moderate concern, not much concern, or no concern at all
about each of the following possibilities?"
|
|
High/ Moderate Concern (NET) |
High Concern |
Moderate Concern |
Not Much Concern |
No Concern at All |
Not Sure/ Decline to Answer |
|
Judges who authorize investigations would not look closely enough at
the justification of that surveillance |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
76 |
34 |
42 |
16 |
8 |
* |
|
|
June 2005 |
% |
75 |
37 |
38 |
16 |
7 |
2 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
77 |
37 |
40 |
12 |
7 |
5 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
78 |
42 |
36 |
12 |
8 |
2 |
|
Oct. 2001 |
% |
79 |
44 |
35 |
11 |
7 |
2 |
|
Congress would not include adequate safeguards for civil liberties when
authorizing these increased powers |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
75 |
35 |
40 |
15 |
9 |
* |
|
|
June 2005 |
% |
76 |
38 |
37 |
14 |
8 |
2 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
74 |
35 |
39 |
13 |
7 |
5 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
75 |
40 |
35 |
14 |
7 |
4 |
|
Oct. 2001 |
% |
78 |
39 |
39 |
12 |
8 |
2 |
|
The White House would not issue the proper rules for legal due process
for government surveillance programs |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
75 |
41 |
34 |
16 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
June 2005 |
% |
72 |
36 |
36 |
14 |
10 |
4 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
69 |
35 |
34 |
17 |
8 |
6 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Oct. 2001 |
% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Law enforcement would investigate legitimate political and social
groups |
Feb. 2006 |
% |
68 |
28 |
40 |
20 |
11 |
1 |
|
|
June 2005 |
% |
68 |
29 |
39 |
20 |
11 |
2 |
|
Sept. 2004 |
% |
68 |
26 |
42 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
|
Feb. 2004 |
% |
67 |
27 |
40 |
18 |
13 |
1 |
|
Oct. 2001 |
% |
68 |
32 |
36 |
16 |
15 |
1 |
Base: All Adults
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
* Less than 0.5%.
TABLE 3
SURVEILLANCE POWERS USED IN PROPER WAY
"Overall, thinking about the possibility of terrorist
threats, do you feel that U.S. law enforcement is using its expanded
surveillance powers in a proper way, or not?"
Base: All Adults
| |
June 2005 |
Feb. 2006 |
|
% |
% |
|
Using expanded surveillance powers in a proper way |
57 |
57 |
|
Not using in a proper way |
34 |
40 |
|
Not sure/Decline to answer |
8 |
3 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
TABLE 4
LIKELIHOOD OF TERRORIST ATTACK IN NEXT 12 MONTHS
"How likely do you think it is that there will be a major
terrorist attack in this country in the next 12 months?"
Base: All Adults
| |
Sept. 2004 |
June 2005 |
Feb. 2006 |
|
% |
% |
% |
|
Likely (NET) |
67 |
55 |
66 |
|
Very likely |
17 |
15 |
17 |
|
Somewhat likely |
50 |
40 |
49 |
|
Not Likely (NET) |
28 |
43 |
32 |
|
Not very likely
|
20 |
31 |
23 |
|
Not likely at all
|
8 |
12 |
10 |
|
Not sure |
5 |
2 |
1 |
|
Decline to answer |
* |
* |
- |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
* Less than 0.5%
TABLE 5
EXTENT THAT GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS HAVE TAKEN AWAY PERSONAL
PRIVACY
"How much do you feel government anti-terrorist
programs have taken your own personal privacy away since September 11,
2001?"
Base: All Adults
| |
Feb.
2004
|
Sept.
2004
|
June
2005
|
Feb.
2006
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
A great deal |
8 |
8 |
10 |
7 |
|
Quite a lot |
6 |
9 |
7 |
7 |
|
A moderate amount |
22 |
21 |
24 |
23 |
|
Only a little |
29 |
26 |
25 |
28 |
|
None at all |
35 |
35 |
32 |
35 |
|
Not sure |
1 |
1 |
1 |
* |
|
Decline to answer |
* |
* |
* |
- |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
* Less than 0.5%
Methodology
The Harris Poll® was conducted by telephone within the United
States between February 7 and 14, 2006 among a nationwide cross section of 1,016
adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race, education, number
of adults, number of voice/telephone lines in the household, region and size of
place were weighted where necessary to align them with their actual proportions
in the population.
In theory, with a probability sample of this size, one can say with 95
percent certainty that the results have a sampling error of plus or minus 3
percentage points of what they would be if the entire U.S. adult population had
been polled with complete accuracy. Unfortunately, there are several other
possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious
than theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include refusals to be
interviewed (nonresponse), question wording and question order, interviewer
bias, weighting by demographic control data and screening (e.g., for likely
voters). It is impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these
factors.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National
Council on Public Polls.
J26827
Q601, Q606, Q610, Q620, Q625
|