|
The Harris Poll® #12, February 8, 2007
President Bush’s Job Performance Continues to be Viewed
Negatively
Now that they are in office, Democrats in Congress are viewed
much more positively than Republicans
It may be a new year, but 2007 is starting just as 2006 ended
for President George W. Bush. Just under one-third (32%) of U.S. adults give the
President positive ratings, while two-thirds view his job performance
negatively. These numbers are virtually unchanged from November, 2006 when they
were 31 percent positive and 67 percent negative. One reason for the President’s
low numbers may be that while almost two thirds (64%) of Republicans view his
job in a positive light, only about half (52%) of Conservatives give him
positive ratings.
While Republican support of the President continues to
diminish, we see the positive attitudes toward the direction of the country also
decreasing slightly. In November, 31 percent said things in the country were
going in the right direction, while 58 percent said things were on the wrong
track. Now, 29 percent say things are going in the right direction, while 62
percent say they are on the wrong track.
These are some of the results from the latest Harris Poll of
1,004 U.S. adults surveyed by telephone between February 2 and 5, 2007 by Harris
Interactive®.
This New Year brings with it a new Congress, and for the
first time in history, a woman sits in the Speaker’s chair. U.S.
Representative Nancy Pelosi begins her service as Speaker of the House in a more
positive light than that of Dennis Hastert at the end of his tenure, but not by
much. Representative Hastert had a 27 percent positive and 48 percent negative
job performance among U.S. adults in September, 2006, compared to Speaker Pelosi’s
38 percent positive job performance and 45 percent negative. Speaker Pelosi’s
counterpart in the Senate, Harry Reid, fares even worse. As Minority Leader in
September 2006, just under one-quarter (23%) had a positive attitude toward his
job performance, while 52 percent had a negative attitude. Five months later,
and with "Majority" in his title, his numbers are virtually unchanged
– 23 percent positive and 47 percent negative.
Those in the minority do not fare any better. New Senate
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell draws just a 19 percent positive rating and a 42
percent negative one. His House counterpart, John Boehner, has a 23 percent
positive and 46 percent negative rating. These numbers are virtually unchanged
from September when Harris Interactive asked about then-Majority Leader Boehner,
who held a 24 percent positive and a 47 percent negative rating.
These negative attitudes toward specific congressional
leaders are surely related to the attitudes toward the institution as a whole,
as well as the two parties. Just one-third of adults hold a positive view of the
job of Congress, while 62 percent have a negative view. Although this is still
low, it is up from September, 2006 when less than one-quarter (24%) had a
positive view and 73 percent had a negative view of the job of Congress.
For the Republicans in Congress, attitudes have not changed
much – following the election, the numbers were at 24 percent positive and 72
percent negative. Currently, it is 26 percent positive and 69 percent negative.
Democrats in Congress, however, have seen their stock go up. In November, over
one-third (36%) had a positive view of their job performance and 57 percent had
a negative view. Now following the "first 100 hours" and one month of
being in control, more adults seem to like what they are seeing, as 41 percent
have a positive view of their performance and 52 percent have a negative view.
Attitudes toward the President’s administration have not
risen with the dawn of the New Year. Vice President Dick Cheney sees his lowest
job performance numbers since the beginning of the administration in 2001 –
only 29 percent have a positive view of his job performance, while 67 percent
have a negative view. This is the first time that the Vice President’s numbers
have gone below 30 percent. In September, 2006, the Vice President’s numbers
were 30 percent positive and 64 percent negative. In the past, Condoleezza Rice
was the "shining star" of the administration and a majority of adults
always gave her positive marks. In September, for example, 55 percent viewed her
job performance in a positive light while 42 percent viewed it negatively. For
the first time as Secretary of State, her numbers have dropped – 46 percent
view her positively while 48 percent view her negatively.
Even the new Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, does not get
a honeymoon. In Secretary Gates’ first appearance on our survey, one-third
(32%) have a positive view of his job, while just over half (52%) have a
negative view. This is actually slightly worse than the last time Harris
Interactive asked about Donald Rumsfeld; in September, 38 percent of adults had
a positive view of the job Mr. Rumsfeld was doing and 58 percent had a negative
view.
Pessimistic attitudes across the board might be due to the
most important issue for the government to address – Iraq. About three in 10
(29%) say "The War" is one of the two most important issues for the
government to address. Add to this the additional 10 percent who say Iraq is one
of the most important issues, and about two in five adults rate Iraq as a top
issue. This is far higher than the 12 percent who mention health care and the
nine percent each who mention the economy and terrorism.
TABLE 1
CURRENT RATINGS OF PRESIDENT, SENIOR CABINET MEMBERS AND
PARTIES IN CONGRESS
"How would you rate the job (READ ITEM) are/is doing –
excellent, pretty good, only fair, or poor?"
Base: All adults
| Excellent | Pretty Good | Only Fair | Poor | Not Sure | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice | 14 | 32 | 28 | 20 | 6 | 46 | 48 | Democrats in Congress | 8 | 33 | 32 | 20 | 7 | 41 | 52 | President George W. Bush | 7 | 25 | 22 | 45 | 1 | 32 | 67 | House Speaker Nancy Pelosi | 6 | 31 | 28 | 17 | 17 | 38 | 45 | Vice President Dick Cheney | 6 | 23 | 22 | 45 | 4 | 29 | 67 | Secretary of Defense Robert Gates | 4 | 29 | 35 | 17 | 16 | 32 | 52 | Republicans in Congress | 4 | 23 | 35 | 34 | 5 | 26 | 69 | Congress | 2 | 31 | 39 | 23 | 5 | 33 | 62 | Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid | 2 | 21 | 32 | 15 | 30 | 23 | 47 | Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell | 2 | 18 | 30 | 12 | 39 | 19 | 42 | House Minority Leader John Boehner | 1 | 22 | 34 | 12 | 31 | 23 | 46 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor TABLE 2 POSITIVE RATINGS: TRENDS SINCE 9/11/01: SUMMARY Base: All adults POSITIVE RATINGS | Soon After 9/11 | Feb. 2003 | April 2003 | Aug. 2003 | Feb. 2004 | April 2004 | Nov. 2004 | Feb. 2005 | April 2005 | Nov. 2005 | Mar 2006 | May 2006 | Sept. 2006 | Feb. 2007 | | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | President George W. Bush | 88 | 52 | 70 | 57 | 51 | 48 | 50 | 48 | 44 | 34 | 36 | 29 | 38 | 32 | Vice President Dick Cheney | 69 | 45 | 55 | 42 | 41 | 36 | 48 | 45 | 37 | 30 | 30 | ** | 30 | 29 | Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | 52 | 54 | 52 | 51 | ** | 55 | 46 |
** Not Applicable. The question was not asked TABLE 3 PRESIDENT BUSH'S OVERALL JOB RATING Not Sure’s Excluded "How would you rate the overall job President George W.Bush is doing as president – excellent, pretty good, only fair, or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 32 | 67 | 2006 | November | 31 | 67 | | | October (10/25) | 34 | 63 | | October (10/13) | 34 | 64 | | September | 38 | 61 | | August (8/24) | 34 | 65 | | August (8/11) | 34 | 66 | | July | 34 | 65 | | June | 33 | 67 | | May | 29 | 71 | | April | 35 | 63 | | March | 36 | 64 | | February | 40 | 58 | | January | 43 | 56 | 2005 | November | 34 | 65 | | | August | 40 | 58 | | June | 45 | 55 | | April | 44 | 56 | | February | 48 | 51 | 2004 | November | 50 | 49 | | | October | 51 | 49 | | September | 45 | 54 | | August | 48 | 51 | | June | 50 | 49 | | April | 48 | 51 | | February | 51 | 48 | 2003 | December | 50 | 49 | | | October | 59 | 40 | | August | 57 | 41 | | June | 61 | 36 | | April | 70 | 29 | | February | 52 | 46 | 2002 | December | 64 | 35 | | | November | 65 | 33 | | October | 64 | 35 | | August | 63 | 37 | | June | 70 | 28 | | May | 74 | 25 | | April | 75 | 23 | | February | 79 | 20 | | January | 79 | 19 | 2001 | December | 82 | 17 | | | November | 86 | 12 | | October | 88 | 11 | | August | 52 | 43 | | June | 50 | 46 | | May | 59 | 35 | | March | 49 | 38 | | February | 56 | 26 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor. TABLE 4 PRESIDENT BUSH'S OVERALL JOB RATING—NOVEMBER 2006 Not Sure’s Excluded "How would you rate the overall job President George W.Bush is doing as president – excellent, pretty good, only fair, or poor?" Base: All adults | | February, 2007 | | % | Excellent/Pretty Good (NET) | 32 | Excellent | 7 | Pretty Good | 25 | Only Fair/Poor (NET) | 67 | Only Fair | 22 | Poor | 45 |
TABLE 5 PRESIDENT BUSH'S OVERALL JOB RATING—BY PARTY AND IDEOLOGY Not Sure’s Excluded "How would you rate the overall job President George W.Bush is doing as president – excellent, pretty good, only fair, or poor?" Base: All adults | | Total | Party | Ideology | Republicans | Independents | Democrats | Conservatives | Moderates | Liberals | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | Positive | 32 | 64 | 31 | 11 | 52 | 27 | 17 | Negative | 67 | 36 | 68 | 89 | 48 | 73 | 82 |
TABLE 6 RATINGS OF VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY Not Sure's Excluded "And how would you rate the job Vice President Cheney isdoing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 29 | 67 | 2006 | September | 30 | 64 | | | June | 31 | 65 | | March | 30 | 67 | 2005 | November | 30 | 65 | | | August | 35 | 60 | | June | 38 | 56 | | April | 37 | 60 | | February | 45 | 52 | 2004 | November | 48 | 50 | | | October | 47 | 51 | | September | 40 | 54 | | August | 40 | 54 | | June | 42 | 49 | | April | 36 | 52 | | February | 41 | 48 | 2003 | December | 42 | 47 | | | October | 42 | 44 | | August | 42 | 45 | | June | 49 | 40 | | April | 55 | 36 | | February | 45 | 44 | 2002 | December | 50 | 37 | | | November | 52 | 39 | | October | 54 | 37 | | September | 52 | 37 | | August | 45 | 43 | | July | 46 | 41 | | June | 55 | 34 | | May | 55 | 33 | | April | 55 | 31 | | March | 59 | 29 | | February | 57 | 31 | | January | 55 | 31 | 2001 | October | 69 | 20 | | | July | 39 | 52 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor. TABLE 7 RATINGS OF SECRETARY OF STATE CONDOLEEZZA RICE Not Sure's Excluded "And how would you rate the job Secretary of StateCondoleezza Rice is doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 46 | 48 | 2006 | September | 55 | 42 | | | June | 52 | 43 | | March | 51 | 44 | 2005 | November | 52 | 41 | | | August | 57 | 37 | | June | 52 | 41 | | April | 54 | 39 | | February | 52 | 40 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor. TABLE 8 RATINGS OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ROBERT GATES Not Sure’s Excluded "And how would you rate the job Secretary of DefenseRobert Gates is doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 32 | 52 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor. TABLE 9 LAST RATINGS OF FORMER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DONALD RUMSFELD Not Sure’s Excluded "And how would you rate the job Secretary of DefenseDonald Rumsfeld is doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults 2006 | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | | September | 38 | 58 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor. TABLE 10 RATINGS OF HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI Not Sure's Excluded "And how would you rate the job House Speaker NancyPelosi is doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 38 | 45 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor. TABLE 11 LAST RATING OF FORMER HOUSE SPEAKER DENNIS HASTERT Not Sure's Excluded "And how would you rate the job House Speaker DennisHastert is doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2006 | September | 27 | 48 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor. TABLE 12 RATINGS OF SENATE MAJORITY LEADER HARRY REID Not Sure's Excluded "And how would you rate the job Senate Majority LeaderHarry Reid is doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 23 | 47 | 2006 | September | 23 | 52 | | | June | 19 | 54 | | March | 19 | 53 | 2005 | August | 24 | 47 |
***Prior to February, 2007, Sen. Reid was the Senate Minority Leader *Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor TABLE 13 RATINGS OF SENATE MINORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL Not Sure's Excluded "And how would you rate the job Senate Minority LeaderMitch McConnell is doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 19 | 42 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor TABLE 14 RATINGS OF HOUSE MINORITY LEADER JOHN BOEHNER Not Sure's Excluded "And how would you rate the job House Minority LeaderJohn Boehner is doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 23 | 46 | 2006 | September*** | 24 | 47 | | | June | 22 | 51 | | March | 23 | 50 |
***Prior to February, 2007, Rep Boehner was the House Majority Leader *Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor TABLE 15 CONGRESS’ OVERALL JOB RATING Not Sure’s Excluded "How would you rate the overall job the Congress is doing– excellent, pretty good, only fair, or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 33 | 62 | 2006 | September | 24 | 73 | | | May | 18 | 80 | | February | 25 | 71 | | January | 25 | 72 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor TABLE 16 RATINGS OF REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS Not Sure’s Excluded "And how would you rate the job Republicans in Congressare doing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 26 | 69 | 2006 | November | 24 | 72 | | | September | 24 | 71 | | June | 25 | 72 | | May | 20 | 76 | | March | 27 | 68 | 2005 | November | 27 | 69 | | | August | 32 | 64 | | June | 37 | 58 | | April | 36 | 61 | 2004 | September | 38 | 56 | | | August | 40 | 54 | | June | 39 | 53 | | April | 35 | 55 | | February | 40 | 52 | 2003 | December | 37 | 51 | | | October | 40 | 50 | | August | 41 | 51 | | June | 45 | 47 | | April | 52 | 41 | | February | 43 | 49 | 2002 | December | 47 | 47 | | | November | 47 | 45 | | October | 46 | 45 | | September | 47 | 42 | | August | 41 | 49 | | June | 46 | 45 | | April | 49 | 39 | | February | 50 | 40 | | January | 58 | 34 | 2001 | October (high) | 67 | 24 | | | August (low) | 37 | 52 | 2000 | May (low) | 33 | 60 | | | February (high) | 38 | 55 | 1999 | October (low) | 32 | 58 | | | September (high) | 39 | 55 | 1998 | June (low) | 31 | 62 | | | February (high) | 44 | 53 | 1997 | June (low) | 31 | 67 | | | February (high) | 38 | 58 | 1996 | May (low) | 29 | 69 | | | January (high) | 33 | 66 | 1995 | November (low) | 35 | 63 | | | April (high) | 42 | 56 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor TABLE 17 RATINGS OF DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS Not Sure’s Excluded "And how would you rate the job Democrats in Congress aredoing – excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Positive* | Negative** | | % | % | 2007 | February | 41 | 52 | 2006 | November | 36 | 57 | | | September | 29 | 67 | | June | 26 | 70 | | May | 23 | 72 | | March | 24 | 70 | 2005 | November | 25 | 70 | | | August | 31 | 65 | | June | 33 | 61 | | April | 34 | 64 | 2004 | September | 34 | 60 | | | August | 35 | 58 | | June | 31 | 59 | | April | 32 | 57 | | February | 33 | 58 | 2003 | December | 28 | 61 | | | October | 34 | 56 | | August | 30 | 60 | | June | 41 | 51 | | April | 39 | 52 | | February | 38 | 54 | 2002 | December | 36 | 55 | | | November | 40 | 52 | | October | 40 | 52 | | September | 42 | 49 | | August | 38 | 54 | | June | 45 | 46 | | April | 47 | 42 | | February | 49 | 41 | | January | 52 | 40 | 2001 | October (high) | 68 | 24 | | | May (low) | 40 | 51 | 2000 | September (high) | 48 | 44 | | | June (low) | 38 | 52 | 1999 | October (low) | 42 | 50 | | | January (high) | 50 | 47 | 1998 | September (high) | 49 | 47 | | | June (low) | 41 | 53 | 1997 | June (low) | 36 | 60 | | | February (high) | 43 | 54 | 1996 | May (high) | 36 | 62 | | | January (low) | 31 | 68 | 1995 | November (high) | 34 | 64 | | | July (low) | 30 | 66 | 1994 | December | 28 | 70 |
*Positive = excellent or pretty good; **Negative = only fair or poor. TABLE 18 RIGHT DIRECTION OR WRONG TRACK No Opinion’s, Not Sure’s and Decline to Answer’sExcluded "Generally speaking, would you say things in the countryare going in the right direction or have they pretty seriously gotten off on thewrong track?" Base: All adults | | TREND | Right Direction | Wrong Track | | % | % | 2007 | February | 29 | 62 | 2006 | November | 31 | 58 | | | October (10/25) | 27 | 63 | | October (10/13) | 29 | 62 | | September | 31 | 59 | | August | 26 | 64 | | July | 28 | 61 | | June | 28 | 64 | | May | 24 | 69 | | April | 27 | 65 | | March | 31 | 60 | | February | 32 | 59 | | January | 33 | 54 | 2005 | November | 27 | 68 | | | August | 37 | 59 | | June | 38 | 55 | | January | 46 | 48 | 2004 | September | 38 | 57 | | | June | 35 | 59 | 2003 | December | 35 | 57 | | | June | 44 | 51 | 2002 | December | 36 | 57 | | | June | 46 | 48 | 2001 | December | 65 | 32 | | | June | 43 | 52 | | January | 46 | 39 | 2000 | October | 50 | 41 | | | June | 40 | 51 | | January | 50 | 38 | 1999 | June | 37 | 55 | | | March | 47 | 45 | 1998 | December | 43 | 51 | | | June | 48 | 44 | 1997 | December | 39 | 56 | | | April | 36 | 55 | 1996 | December | 38 | 50 | | | June | 29 | 64 | 1995 | December | 26 | 62 | | | June | 24 | 65 | 1994 | December | 29 | 63 | | | June | 28 | 65 |
TABLE 19 MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES FOR GOVERNMENT to address "What do you think are the two most importantissues for the government to address?" Spontaneous, unprompted replies Base: All Adults | ‘96 | ‘97 | ‘98 | ‘99 | ‘00 | ‘01 | ‘02 | ‘03 | ‘04 | ‘05 | ‘06 | ‘06 | "06 | 06 | 06 | 06 | 07 | | April | May | Jan | Feb | Aug | Dec | Dec | June | Oct | Aug | Feb | June | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Feb | | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | (The) war | X | X | X | X | X | 12 | 18 | 8 | 35 | 41 | 27 | 27 | 28 | 22 | 29 | 33 | 29 | Healthcare (not Medicare) | 16 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 11 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 12 | Iraq / (Saddam Hussein) | * | * | * | 1 | - | - | 11 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 10 | The economy (non-specific) | 14 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 32 | 34 | 25 | 28 | 19 | 15 | 14 | 16 | 13 | 15 | 12 | 9 | Terrorism | X | X | X | X | X | 22 | 17 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 9 | Education | 14 | 15 | 14 | 21 | 25 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 7 | Immigration | 2 | 2 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 7 | Taxes | 11 | 14 | 16 | 12 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | Budget/Government spending | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | Employment/jobs | 9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 | Environment | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Foreign policy (non-specific) | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Drugs | 4 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | * | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | Social security | X | 6 | 6 | 24 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | Military/defense | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Homeland/domestic security/public safety | X | X | X | X | X | 8 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | National security | X | X | X | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Crime/violence | 16 | 19 | 13 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Homelessness | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Human/civil/women's rights | 2 | 2 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Religion (decline of) | * | * | 1 | * | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | * | * | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | 2 | Inflation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Election/Voter reform | X | X | X | X | X | X | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | * | * | * | 2 | Energy | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | AIDS | 1 | * | 1 | x | * | * | * | 2 | x | * | * | * | 1 | 1 | * | * | 2 | (Programs for) the poor/ poverty | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | * | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | Medicare | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | Abortion | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Peace/world peace/nuclear arms | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Gas and oil prices | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Welfare | 13 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | * | 3 | 1 | 1 | X | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | Family values (decline of) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | * | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | Disaster relief/Hurricane Relief | x | x | x | x | X | X | x | x | X | x | 1 | 1 | * | * | * | * | 1 | Same sex rights | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 1 | 1 | * | 2 | * | * | 1 | * | 1 | Downsizing government | X | X | X | X | 1 | * | X | X | 1 | * | * | 1 | * | * | * | * | 1 | Medical research | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | * | 1 | * | * | 1 | 1 | Domestic/social issues (non-specific) | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | * | 3 | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | Judicial/Legal Issues | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | * | 2 | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | Honesty/Integrity/Moral Values | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 2 | 2 | * | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | * | 1 | Ethics in government | * | * | * | * | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | * | Middle East peace process between Palestinians and Israel | X | X | X | X | X | 2 | 2 | 2 | * | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | * | FEMA | x | x | x | x | X | X | x | x | X | x | * | * | 1 | X | X | x | * | Bush/president | x | x | x | x | X | X | x | x | X | x | 1 | X | * | 1 | 1 | x | * | Air Travel Safety | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | * | * | X | * | X | * | 1 | 1 | X | * | * | School safety | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 2 | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | * | * | * | North Korea | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | * | X | * | * | X | Other1 | 7 | 8 | 19 | 2 | 19 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 6 | Not sure/refused/no issue | 7 | 9 | 12 | 16 | 18 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
* = Less than 0.5%, X = Not mentioned as specific issue
1 Including government/politics (nonspecific), housing, Foreign Aid,
trade, disability, promoting democracy, race relations, campaign finance, youth
and programs for the elderly (not Medicare/Social Security)
The August column refers to the August 24th release
Methodology
The Harris Poll® was conducted by telephone
within the United States between February 2 and 5, 2007 among a nationwide cross
section of 1,004 adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex,
race/ethnicity, education, region, number of adults in the household, size of
place (urbanicity) and number of phone lines in the household were weighted
where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the
population.
All surveys are subject to several sources of error. These
include: sampling error (because only a sample of a population is interviewed);
measurement error due to question wording and/or question order, deliberately or
unintentionally inaccurate responses, nonresponse (including refusals),
interviewer effects (when live interviewers are used) and weighting.
With one exception (sampling error) the magnitude of the
errors that result cannot be estimated. There is, therefore, no way to calculate
a finite "margin of error" for any survey and the use of these words
should be avoided.
With pure probability samples, with 100 percent response
rates, it is possible to calculate the probability that the sampling error (but
not other sources of error) is not greater than some number. With a pure
probability sample of 1,004, one could say with a ninety-five percent
probability that the overall results would have a sampling error of +/-3
percentage points. However that does not take other sources of error into
account.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of
the National Council on Public Polls.
J30275
QA1, QA2, QA3
|