|
The Harris Poll® #34, April 23, 2007
U.S. Adults Less Likely Than Europeans to Think Humans Are
Contributing to the Increase in Global Temperatures
Germans, British, and Americans least likely to think global
warming will present a threat in their lifetime
As the nation
celebrated Earth Day this past weekend, there is a definite a difference in how
those in the U.S. feel about global warming when compared to their European
counterparts. While two-thirds of U.S. adults (65%) believe humans are
contributing to an increase in global temperatures, this is less than the
British (77%), Italian (87%) and French and Spanish (88% each) who believe this.
The country where they are most likely to believe humans are contributing to
this increase in temperatures is Germany (92%).
The U.S. data are the results of a nationwide Harris Poll of
2,563 adults surveyed online between April 10 and 16, 2007. The European data
are the results of a Financial Times/Harris Poll survey conducted online between
November 2 and 10, 2006. The total number of interviews for each country was:
1,039 adults, aged 16 and older in Great Britain; 1,125 adults, 16 and older in
France; 1,089 adults, 16 and older in Italy; 1,007 adults, 16 and older in
Spain; and 1,086 adults, 16 and older in Germany.
Among those who do believe humans are increasing global
temperatures, U.S adults are more in line with some of their European
counterparts in characterizing the severity of the increase. Half of U.S.
adults, Germans (51%), British (52%) and Italians (53%) would characterize the
increase in global temperatures as substantial. The Spanish and the French are
more likely than the other country’s citizens to believe this increase is
substantial (63% and 74% respectively).
There is a divide among the nations when it comes to whether
global warming will present a threat within their lifetime. Those in Germany,
Great Britain and the U.S are on one side, saying that global warming will
present a threat to them and their family (27%, 34% and 36% respectively), while
two-thirds (67%) of Spanish adults say the opposite. Italy and France are in the
middle with just under half of Italians (46%) and just over half of the French
(52%) believing in this Potential threat.
Global Warming versus Climate Change
One interesting issue is what to call this problem. Some say
global warming and others say climate change. Is there a difference in the minds
of U.S. adults on this? The answer is no, not really, though climate change may
be considered just a little worse. We asked a series of questions on whether
people and/or institutions had done the right amount to help reduce the
greenhouse gases that contribute to this problem. For half of our sample, we
used the term global warming while the other half was asked about climate
change.
For the half that was asked about global warming, 44 percent
felt the media was doing too little, 62 percent felt the President was doing too
little, 66 percent felt the general public was doing too little and 74 percent
felt large corporations were doing too little. For these same four institutions,
the half that was asked about climate change had one consistent difference :a
slightly higher number said each of these institutions was doing too little to
help reduce greenhouse gases which contribute to climate change (48% for the
media, 64% for the president, 67% for the general public and 75% for large
corporations). While this difference for each institution may not be large
enough to be statistically significant, it is definitely interesting.
The role of the media
The media also plays a role in the debate about climate
change. Just under half (46%) believe the threats to the environment that the
media reports on are as serious as the media portrays them while just over
one-third (37%) say the media is exaggerating these threats to get the public to
pay more attention to them. There is a slight gender difference as three in ten
women (31%) say the media is exaggerating while 43 percent of men feel this way.
Not surprisingly, there is also a partisan difference. While
two-thirds (65%) of Democrats say the threats are as serious as the media
portrays, just one-quarter (26%) of Republicans believe that is true.
Independents fall right in the middle – 41 percent say the media is
exaggerating the threats while 45 percent of Independents say the threats are as
serious as the media portrays.
Who is an environmentalist?
Just 5 percent of adults say they are an active
environmentalist while 55 percent say they are sympathetic to environmental
causes. One-third of adults (34%) say they consider themselves neutral while
only 2 percent say they are unsympathetic to environmental causes. Republicans
are more likely to say they are neutral (43%) while Democrats are more likely to
say they are sympathetic to environmental causes (63%). Interestingly, there is
no real difference by party in those who say they are an active environmentalist
(4% of Republicans and 5% of Democrats).
Age also is not as much of a factor in who is sympathetic to
environmental causes. As one might expect, those who are Matures (62 and older)
are the least likely to say they are sympathetic to environmental causes (51%).
But, at the other end of the spectrum, Baby Boomers (aged 43-61) are most likely
to say they are sympathetic (58%).
TABLE 1
HUMANS CONTRIBUTING TO GLOBAL WARMING
"Thinking about climate change, do you believe that the
activities of human beings are contributing to an increase in global
temperatures?"
Base: All adults
|
|
U.S. |
Great
Britain
|
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
65 |
77 |
88 |
87 |
88 |
92 |
|
No |
21 |
12 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
|
Not Sure |
13 |
11 |
7 |
8 |
8 |
5 |
TABLE 2
EXTENT OF GLOBAL WARMING
"Would you characterize this increase in global
temperatures as slight, moderate or substantial?"
Base: Believe humans contributing to increased global temperatures
|
|
U.S. |
Great
Britain
|
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Slight |
14 |
15 |
3 |
9 |
10 |
13 |
|
Moderate |
33 |
33 |
23 |
39 |
26 |
36 |
|
Substantial |
50 |
52 |
74 |
53 |
63 |
51 |
Note: The U.S. sample was provided with a Not Sure option; 3% said Not Sure
TABLE 3
GLOBAL WARMING AS THREAT TO HUMANS
"Will global warming present a threat to you and your
family within your lifetime?"
Base: All adults
|
|
U.S. |
Great
Britain
|
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
36 |
34 |
52 |
46 |
67 |
27 |
|
No |
41 |
35 |
28 |
26 |
14 |
40 |
|
Not Sure |
24 |
31 |
20 |
27 |
19 |
32 |
TABLE 4
REDUCING GREENHOUSE GASES WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO GLOBAL WARMING
"For each of the following, please tell us if you think
they’ve done too much, too little or about the right amount to help reduce
greenhouse gases which contribute to global warming?"
Base: All U.S. adults
|
|
Too Much |
Right
Amount
|
Too Little |
Not Sure |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
The Media |
20 |
23 |
44 |
13 |
|
The President |
3 |
22 |
62 |
13 |
|
The General Public |
3 |
20 |
66 |
12 |
|
Large Corporations |
3 |
12 |
74 |
12 |
TABLE 5
REDUCING GREENHOUSE GASES WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO CLIMATE CHANGE
"For each of the following, please tell us if you think
they’ve done too much, too little or about the right amount to help reduce
greenhouse gases which contribute to climate change?"
Base: All U.S. adults
|
|
Too Much |
Right
Amount
|
Too Little |
Not Sure |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
The Media |
17 |
20 |
48 |
14 |
|
The President |
4 |
21 |
64 |
12 |
|
Large Corporations |
4 |
11 |
75 |
10 |
|
The General Public |
3 |
19 |
67 |
11 |
TABLE 6
ROLE OF THE MEDIA
"Lately there have been a lot of reports about threats to
the environment. In general, which is closer to your view?"
Base: All U.S. adults
|
|
Total |
Gender |
Party Identification |
|
% |
Male |
Female |
Rep |
Dem |
Ind. |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
The media is exaggerating these threats in order to get the public to
pay more attention to them |
37 |
43 |
31 |
58 |
18 |
41 |
|
These threats to the environment are as serious as the media portrays. |
46 |
42 |
50 |
26 |
65 |
45 |
|
Not Sure |
17 |
15 |
19 |
16 |
16 |
14 |
TABLE 7
ENVIRONMENTALIST OR NOT?
"Do you think of yourself as…?"
Base: All U.S. adults
|
|
Total |
Generation |
Party ID |
|
Echo Boomers
(18-30)
|
Gen
X
(31-42)
|
Baby Boomers
(43-61)
|
Matures
(62+)
|
Rep |
Dem |
Ind. |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
An active environmentalist |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
|
Sympathetic to environmental causes |
55 |
56 |
54 |
58 |
51 |
47 |
63 |
57 |
|
Neutral |
34 |
29 |
34 |
33 |
40 |
43 |
26 |
34 |
|
Unsympathetic to environmental causes |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
|
Not Sure |
4 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
Methodology
This Harris Poll® was conducted online within the
United States between April 10 and 16, 2007, among 2,563 adults (aged 18 and
over). The Financial Times/Harris Poll was conducted in 5 European countries
among adults, 16 and older, between November 2 and 10, 2006. The sample size for
each of the countries was: Great Britain – 1,039; France – 1,125; Italy –
1,089; Spain – 1,007; and Germany – 1,086. Figures for age, sex, race,
education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring
them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score
weighting was also used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.
All surveys are subject to several sources of error. These
include: sampling error (because only a sample of a population is interviewed);
measurement error due to question wording and/or question order, deliberately or
unintentionally inaccurate responses, nonresponse (including refusals),
interviewer effects (when live interviewers are used) and weighting.
With one exception (sampling error) the magnitude of the
errors that result cannot be estimated. There is, therefore, no way to calculate
a finite "margin of error" for any survey and the use of these words
should be avoided.
With pure probability samples, with 100 percent response
rates, it is possible to calculate the probability that the sampling error (but
not other sources of error) is not greater than some number. With a pure
probability sample of 2,563 adults one could say with a ninety-five percent
probability that the overall results would have a sampling error of +/- two
percentage points. For each of the European samples, one could say with a
ninety-five percent probability that the overall results would have a sampling
error of +/- three percentage points. However that does not take other sources
of error into account. This online survey is not based on a probability sample
and therefore no theoretical sampling error can be calculated.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of
the National Council on Public Polls.
J29951
Q605, 610, 615, 620, 623, 625, 630
J5978
Q3005, 3006, 3010
|