The Harris Poll® #102, October 22, 2007

What European Reform Treaty? FT/Harris Poll Finds Majorities in Five Largest European Countries Know Nothing about It

Large Majorities Want Their Countries to Hold Referendums in Their Countries before a New Treaty is Adopted

A new Financial Times/Harris Poll examines public opinion in the five largest European countries, Britain, France, Italy, Spain and Germany, on issues related to the so-called "reform treaty" that would re-shape the institutions of the European Union. The treaty, if adopted, would change voting procedures, expand the role of both the European Parliament and national legislatures, and include a charter of fundamental rights. EU leaders, meeting in Lisbon on October 18, endorsed the proposed new treaty.

This poll which was conducted just before the EU Summit finds that hardly anyone in these five European countries is very familiar with the treaty and most people are not at all familiar with it (between 54% and 68% say they are not at all familiar).

This survey also finds that majorities of adults, who are at least somewhat familiar with the treaty in all five countries, from 63 percent in France to 76 percent in Germany, want their countries to hold referendums on the treaty before it is adopted. Another key finding is that modest pluralities of those who are familiar with the treaty, but far less than majorities, believe a new reform treaty would have a positive effect in four of the countries, but that a 51 percent majority in Britain believes it would have negative effect. Britain is, and has been, far more hostile to the European Union than most other European countries, influenced permanently by the anti-European editorial policies of most British newspapers.

These are some of the results of a Financial Times/Harris Poll conducted online by Harris Interactive® among a total of over 1,000 adults in each of the five countries between October 3 and 15, 2007.

Given that so many people are not familiar with the new reform treaty it is no surprise that many people have no opinions, positive or negative about it, even after some information about the treaty was given to them. After the first question on familiarity, those interviewed were told that the new treaty "establishes a Permanent President of the European Council, appointed by national governments for a period of two and a half years. This would replace the present system where the President of the European Council rotates every six months".

Other interesting results of this poll include:

  • There is no consensus in these five countries as to which institutions in Europe have the most power — The European Parliament, the European commission, the national governments of European Union countries, or the European Court of Justice.

Very large numbers of people have no opinion on whether or not the new treaty would:

  • Increase the power of the E.U;
  • Provide greater continuity;
  • Create a European superstate;
  • Enable the E.U. to operate more effectively.

However pluralities in most of the countries (and majorities in a couple of cases) think that on balance the new treaty is more likely than not to have all these effects.

TABLE 1

FAMILIARITY WITH EU REFORM TREATY

"Now for some questions on Europe. How familiar are you with the newly proposed EU reform treaty?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

%

%

%

%

%

Extremely familiar

2

1

1

1

1

Very familiar

3

6

3

3

3

Somewhat familiar

27

38

34

43

30

Not at all familiar

68

56

62

54

67

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 2

NATIONAL REFERENDUM ON TREATY

"Do you think there should be a national referendum on the EU reform treaty?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries who are at least somewhat familiar with treaty

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

%

%

%

%

%

Yes

75

63

72

65

76

No

14

27

17

21

19

Not sure

11

10

10

14

5

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 3

IMPACT OF TREATY ON INDIVIDUAL COUNTRY

"Would the proposed reform treaty have a positive or negative impact for [Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, U.S.] or no impact at all?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries who are at least somewhat familiar with treaty

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

%

%

%

%

%

Positive impact

17

35

49

44

42

No impact at all

10

12

16

14

18

Negative impact

51

21

13

16

20

Not sure

21

32

23

26

19

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 4

MOST POWERFUL EU ORGANIZATION

"Which of the following organizations do you regard as the most powerful in the EU today?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries who are at least somewhat familiar with treaty

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

%

%

%

%

%

The European Parliament

21

21

28

34

19

The European Commission

15

31

26

17

21

National governments of all EU countries

18

22

22

23

24

The European Court of Justice

27

18

12

11

21

Other organization

2

9

2

4

12

Not sure

16

*

10

11

3

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

* = Less than 0.5%

TABLE 5

PERMANENT PRESIDENT AND POWER OF EU

Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement?

(a) The appointment of a permanent president would increase the power of the EU."

Base: All EU adults in five countries

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

%

%

%

%

%

AGREE (NET)

34

45

46

44

43

Strongly agree

10

13

8

15

7

Somewhat agree

24

32

37

28

36

Neither agree nor disagree

53

39

36

36

40

DISAGREE (NET)

13

16

18

20

17

Somewhat disagree

9

10

12

11

9

Strongly disagree

4

6

7

9

8

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 6

PERMANENT PRESIDENT AND CONTINUITY

Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement?

(b) The appointment of a permanent president would provide greater continuity."

Base: All EU adults in five countries

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

%

%

%

%

%

AGREE (NET)

36

61

57

50

57

Strongly agree

7

20

14

17

11

Somewhat agree

30

41

43

33

46

Neither agree nor disagree

46

25

28

31

29

DISAGREE (NET)

18

14

15

19

13

Somewhat disagree

8

9

10

11

7

Strongly disagree

10

5

5

8

6

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 7

PERMANENT PRESIDENT AND A EUROPEAN SUPERSTATE

Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement?

(c) The appointment of a permanent president would create a European superstate."

Base: All EU adults in five countries

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

%

%

%

%

%

AGREE (NET)

37

37

33

36

19

Strongly agree

12

9

7

10

3

Somewhat agree

24

28

27

26

16

Neither agree nor disagree

48

41

43

41

44

DISAGREE (NET)

15

22

23

23

37

Somewhat disagree

10

12

15

14

23

Strongly disagree

5

10

8

9

14

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 8

PERMANENT PRESIDENT AND EFFECTIVENESS

Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement?

(d) The appointment of a permanent president of the European Union would enable the EU to operate more effectively."

Base: All EU adults in five countries

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

%

%

%

%

%

AGREE (NET)

29

56

55

43

44

Strongly agree

6

17

14

14

9

Somewhat agree

23

38

42

30

35

Neither agree nor disagree

45

28

30

36

38

DISAGREE (NET)

26

16

15

20

18

Somewhat disagree

13

11

8

13

10

Strongly disagree

12

5

7

8

8

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

Methodology

This FT/Harris Poll was conducted online by Harris Interactive among a total of 5,604 adults (aged 16-64) within France (1,122), Germany (1,126), Great Britain (1,138), and Spain (1,090) and adults (aged 18-64) in Italy (1,128) between 3 and 15 October 2007. Figures for age, sex, education, region and Internet usage were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.

All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words "margin of error" as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.

Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the adult populations of the respective countries. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.

These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls and of the British Polling Council.

J6572

Q1200, 1210, 1215, 1220, 1225



©2007, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited without the express written permission of Harris Interactive.



Print
Printer Friendly Version of this Release

Follow The Harris Poll on:
twitter

Subscribe to Over the Wire – Weblog commentary of research data on current events and social trends
Sign-up for Harris Poll Weekly
About The Harris Poll
The Harris Poll by Date
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Financial Times / Harris Poll
Search The Harris Poll Library
News Room
PRIVACYSURVEY DEMOESOMAR 26 QUESTIONSJOIN OUR PANELSITE MAPSEARCH

©2009 Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.