|
The Harris Poll® #102, October 22, 2007
What European Reform Treaty? FT/Harris Poll Finds Majorities
in Five Largest European Countries Know Nothing about It
Large Majorities Want Their Countries to Hold Referendums in
Their Countries before a New Treaty is Adopted
A new Financial Times/Harris Poll examines public opinion in
the five largest European countries, Britain, France, Italy, Spain and Germany,
on issues related to the so-called "reform treaty" that would re-shape
the institutions of the European Union. The treaty, if adopted, would change
voting procedures, expand the role of both the European Parliament and national
legislatures, and include a charter of fundamental rights. EU leaders, meeting
in Lisbon on October 18, endorsed the proposed new treaty.
This poll which was conducted just before the EU Summit finds
that hardly anyone in these five European countries is very familiar with the
treaty and most people are not at all familiar with it (between 54% and 68% say
they are not at all familiar).
This survey also finds that majorities of adults, who are at
least somewhat familiar with the treaty in all five countries, from 63 percent
in France to 76 percent in Germany, want their countries to hold referendums on
the treaty before it is adopted. Another key finding is that modest pluralities
of those who are familiar with the treaty, but far less than majorities, believe
a new reform treaty would have a positive effect in four of the countries, but
that a 51 percent majority in Britain believes it would have negative effect.
Britain is, and has been, far more hostile to the European Union than most other
European countries, influenced permanently by the anti-European editorial
policies of most British newspapers.
These are some of the results of a Financial Times/Harris
Poll conducted online by Harris Interactive® among a total of over 1,000
adults in each of the five countries between October 3 and 15, 2007.
Given that so many people are not familiar with the new
reform treaty it is no surprise that many people have no opinions, positive or
negative about it, even after some information about the treaty was given to
them. After the first question on familiarity, those interviewed were told that
the new treaty "establishes a Permanent President of the European
Council, appointed by national governments for a period of two and a half years.
This would replace the present system where the President of the European
Council rotates every six months".
Other interesting results of this poll include:
- There is no consensus in these five countries as to which institutions in
Europe have the most power — The European Parliament, the European
commission, the national governments of European Union countries, or the
European Court of Justice.
Very large numbers of people have no opinion on whether or
not the new treaty would:
- Increase the power of the E.U;
- Provide greater continuity;
- Create a European superstate;
- Enable the E.U. to operate more effectively.
However pluralities in most of the countries (and majorities
in a couple of cases) think that on balance the new treaty is more likely than
not to have all these effects.
TABLE 1
FAMILIARITY WITH EU REFORM TREATY
"Now for some questions on Europe. How familiar are you
with the newly proposed EU reform treaty?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Extremely familiar |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Very familiar |
3 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
Somewhat familiar |
27 |
38 |
34 |
43 |
30 |
|
Not at all familiar |
68 |
56 |
62 |
54 |
67 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 2
NATIONAL REFERENDUM ON TREATY
"Do you think there should be a national referendum on
the EU reform treaty?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries who are at least
somewhat familiar with treaty
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
75 |
63 |
72 |
65 |
76 |
|
No |
14 |
27 |
17 |
21 |
19 |
|
Not sure |
11 |
10 |
10 |
14 |
5 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 3
IMPACT OF TREATY ON INDIVIDUAL COUNTRY
"Would the proposed reform treaty have a positive or
negative impact for [Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, U.S.] or no
impact at all?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries who are at least
somewhat familiar with treaty
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Positive impact |
17 |
35 |
49 |
44 |
42 |
|
No impact at all |
10 |
12 |
16 |
14 |
18 |
|
Negative impact |
51 |
21 |
13 |
16 |
20 |
|
Not sure |
21 |
32 |
23 |
26 |
19 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 4
MOST POWERFUL EU ORGANIZATION
"Which of the following organizations do you regard as
the most powerful in the EU today?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries who are at least
somewhat familiar with treaty
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
The European Parliament |
21 |
21 |
28 |
34 |
19 |
|
The European Commission |
15 |
31 |
26 |
17 |
21 |
|
National governments of all EU countries |
18 |
22 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
|
The European Court of Justice |
27 |
18 |
12 |
11 |
21 |
|
Other organization |
2 |
9 |
2 |
4 |
12 |
|
Not sure |
16 |
* |
10 |
11 |
3 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
* = Less than 0.5%
TABLE 5
PERMANENT PRESIDENT AND POWER OF EU
Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the
following statement?
(a) The appointment of a permanent president would increase
the power of the EU."
Base: All EU adults in five countries
|
Great Britain
|
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
AGREE (NET) |
34 |
45 |
46 |
44 |
43 |
|
Strongly agree |
10 |
13 |
8 |
15 |
7 |
|
Somewhat agree |
24 |
32 |
37 |
28 |
36 |
|
Neither agree nor disagree |
53 |
39 |
36 |
36 |
40 |
|
DISAGREE (NET) |
13 |
16 |
18 |
20 |
17 |
|
Somewhat disagree |
9 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
|
Strongly disagree |
4 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
8 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 6
PERMANENT PRESIDENT AND CONTINUITY
Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the
following statement?
(b) The appointment of a permanent president would provide
greater continuity."
Base: All EU adults in five countries
|
Great Britain
|
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
AGREE (NET) |
36 |
61 |
57 |
50 |
57 |
|
Strongly agree |
7 |
20 |
14 |
17 |
11 |
|
Somewhat agree |
30 |
41 |
43 |
33 |
46 |
|
Neither agree nor disagree |
46 |
25 |
28 |
31 |
29 |
|
DISAGREE (NET) |
18 |
14 |
15 |
19 |
13 |
|
Somewhat disagree |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
7 |
|
Strongly disagree |
10 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
6 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 7
PERMANENT PRESIDENT AND A EUROPEAN SUPERSTATE
Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the
following statement?
(c) The appointment of a permanent president would create a
European superstate."
Base: All EU adults in five countries
|
Great Britain
|
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
AGREE (NET) |
37 |
37 |
33 |
36 |
19 |
|
Strongly agree |
12 |
9 |
7 |
10 |
3 |
|
Somewhat agree |
24 |
28 |
27 |
26 |
16 |
|
Neither agree nor disagree |
48 |
41 |
43 |
41 |
44 |
|
DISAGREE (NET) |
15 |
22 |
23 |
23 |
37 |
|
Somewhat disagree |
10 |
12 |
15 |
14 |
23 |
|
Strongly disagree |
5 |
10 |
8 |
9 |
14 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 8
PERMANENT PRESIDENT AND EFFECTIVENESS
Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the
following statement?
(d) The appointment of a permanent president of the European
Union would enable the EU to operate more effectively."
Base: All EU adults in five countries
|
Great Britain
|
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
AGREE (NET) |
29 |
56 |
55 |
43 |
44 |
|
Strongly agree |
6 |
17 |
14 |
14 |
9 |
|
Somewhat agree |
23 |
38 |
42 |
30 |
35 |
|
Neither agree nor disagree |
45 |
28 |
30 |
36 |
38 |
|
DISAGREE (NET) |
26 |
16 |
15 |
20 |
18 |
|
Somewhat disagree |
13 |
11 |
8 |
13 |
10 |
|
Strongly disagree |
12 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
8 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
Methodology
This FT/Harris Poll was conducted online by Harris
Interactive among a total of 5,604 adults (aged 16-64) within France (1,122),
Germany (1,126), Great Britain (1,138), and Spain (1,090) and adults (aged
18-64) in Italy (1,128) between 3 and 15 October 2007. Figures for age, sex,
education, region and Internet usage were weighted where necessary to bring them
into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score
weighting was used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.
All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use
probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most
often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage
error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording
and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore,
Harris Interactive avoids the words "margin of error" as they are
misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors
with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100%
response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close
to this ideal.
Respondents for this survey were selected from among those
who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been
weighted to reflect the composition of the adult populations of the respective
countries. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the
Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be
calculated.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of
the National Council on Public Polls and of the British Polling Council.
J6572
Q1200, 1210, 1215, 1220, 1225
|