|
The Harris Poll® #21, February 26, 2008
Adults in Five Largest European Countries and the U.S.
Supportive of Renewable Energy, But Unwilling to Pay Much More for It
As energy costs continue to soar, and an increased reliance
on traditional oil and coal is questioned, alternate sources of energy are
examined more closely. Many in the five largest countries in Europe and in the
United States like the idea of renewable energy, but do not want to pay any more
for renewable energy sources. A majority of adults who have some form of
responsibility for paying household energy bills in Great Britain (54%) and
Germany (50%), pluralities in Italy (44%), France (42%) and the U.S. (40%), as
well as just over one-third of adults responsible for paying household energy
bills in Spain (35%), all say they would be willing to pay nothing more for
energy if it was from renewable sources.
These are some of the results of a Financial Times/Harris
Poll conducted online by Harris Interactive® among a total of
6,448 adults aged 16 to 64 within France, Germany, Great Britain, Spain and the
United States, and adults aged 18 to 64 in Italy, between January 30 and
February 8, 2008.
When this decision of paying more is translated into actual
currency, it makes it even less likely that people will be willing to pay more.
Using European Commission estimates that it would cost each household an extra
€150, £110 or $220 (depending on country) per month to cut greenhouse gasses
and get more renewable energy, strong majorities of adults who have some form of
responsibility for paying household energy bills in all six countries say they
would be not at all likely to pay this extra amount.
Looking at taxes on cars, here majorities favor a higher tax
on higher carbon emission cars. From a high of 78 percent of adults favoring
this idea in Spain to a low of just over half (53%) of adults favoring it in the
U.S., it is a winning idea. An even stronger idea is that of having a lower tax
on lower carbon emission cars. At least three-quarters of adults in all six
countries favor this idea. In fact, majorities of Italians (53%) and Spaniards
(55%) strongly favor lower taxes on lower carbon emitting cars.
Building New Sources of Energy
Looking specifically to two sources of energy – nuclear and
wind – majorities of adults in these six countries are in favor of one type
and mixed on the other. When it comes to the number of wind farms in their
country, strong majorities in all six countries (from 79% to 92%) are in favor
of seeing a large increase. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, produces more
mixed feelings. A majority of Italians (58%) are in favor of building new
nuclear plants in their country. Two-thirds of Spaniards (68%) as well as 64
percent of Germans and just over half (55%) of adults in Great Britain, however,
are all opposed to building new power plants in their respective countries.
France and the U.S. are more closely divided. In France, 51 percent are opposed
while in the U.S., 52 percent favor building new power plants.
Government Subsidies
When it comes to actually having the government create a
financial subsidy for the development of nuclear power, the feeling equals those
of building new plants. Italians are most supportive, as three in five (62%) are
in favor of such a subsidy. Majorities in Germany (66%), Spain (64%), Great
Britain (58%) and the U.S. (54%) are all opposed to a subsidy for nuclear power
development. Again, France is the most divided as 52 percent oppose this subsidy
while 48 percent would be in favor of it. Bio-fuels, however, are a different
story. Strong majorities in all six countries (from 65% in Germany to 90% in
Italy) would favor a government subsidy for bio-fuels.
So What?
Support for bio-fuels and wind farms is strong across these
six countries. But, what is also clear is that while people support renewable
electricity, they are not willing to actually pay more for these alternative
types of energy. Until people are forced to do so, or the price for renewable
energy comes down considerably, people will not make the "green"
choice. This is especially true as economies around the globe tighten. When it
comes to food or solar power, food will win for the consumer each time.
TABLE 1
PAYING MORE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY
"How much of an increase would you be willing to pay at
the most for energy if it were from renewable sources?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults who have
some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
United States |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Unweighted base |
884 |
934 |
807 |
848 |
968 |
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing more |
54 |
42 |
44 |
35 |
50 |
40 |
|
5% more |
18 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
22 |
17 |
|
10% more |
12 |
16 |
15 |
14 |
14 |
17 |
|
15% more |
2 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
|
20% more |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
30% more |
1 |
* |
* |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
40% more |
1 |
* |
* |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Not sure |
10 |
10 |
5 |
17 |
5 |
11 |
|
AVERAGE |
3.9% |
4.7% |
5.1% |
5.3% |
4.4% |
6.1% |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 2
LIKELIHOOD OF PAYING MORE EACH MONTH FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY
"The European Commission estimates it would cost each
household an extra [€150, £110, $220] on a monthly basis on gas and
electricity bills to cut green house emissions and get more renewable energy.
Given the choice, how likely would you be to pay this extra [€150, £110,
$220] per month?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults who have
some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
United States |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Unweighted base |
884 |
934 |
807 |
848 |
968 |
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completely likely |
2 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
|
Very likely |
2 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
Fairly likely |
11 |
10 |
14 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
|
Somewhat likely |
13 |
17 |
20 |
21 |
21 |
16 |
|
Not at all likely |
72 |
69 |
57 |
62 |
65 |
71 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 3
HIGHER TAXES ON HIGHER CARBON EMISSION CARS
"How much do you favor or oppose a higher tax on higher
carbon emission cars?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
United States |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Unweighted base |
1087 |
1076 |
1045 |
1109 |
1111 |
1020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAVOR (NET) |
65 |
67 |
71 |
78 |
57 |
53 |
|
Strongly favor |
31 |
31 |
32 |
46 |
20 |
21 |
|
Favor more than oppose |
34 |
37 |
39 |
32 |
37 |
32 |
|
OPPOSE (NET) |
35 |
33 |
29 |
22 |
43 |
47 |
|
Oppose more than favor |
23 |
19 |
18 |
14 |
24 |
27 |
|
Strongly oppose |
12 |
14 |
11 |
8 |
19 |
20 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 4
LOWER TAXES ON LOWER CARBON EMISSION CARS
"How much do you favor or oppose a lower tax on lower
carbon emission cars?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
United States |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Unweighted base |
1087 |
1076 |
1045 |
1109 |
1111 |
1020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAVOR (NET) |
86 |
79 |
91 |
90 |
89 |
78 |
|
Strongly favor |
39 |
34 |
53 |
55 |
44 |
37 |
|
Favor more than oppose |
46 |
44 |
38 |
35 |
45 |
41 |
|
OPPOSE (NET) |
14 |
21 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
22 |
|
Oppose more than favor |
11 |
13 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
14 |
|
Strongly oppose |
4 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 5
BUILDING NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
"How much do you favor or oppose building new nuclear
power plants in [the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.]?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
United States |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Unweighted base |
1087 |
1076 |
1045 |
1109 |
1111 |
1020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAVOR (NET) |
45 |
49 |
58 |
32 |
36 |
52 |
|
Strongly favor |
13 |
15 |
29 |
12 |
12 |
20 |
|
Favor more than oppose |
32 |
34 |
30 |
20 |
25 |
32 |
|
OPPOSE (NET) |
55 |
51 |
42 |
68 |
64 |
48 |
|
Oppose more than favor |
35 |
31 |
21 |
28 |
29 |
31 |
|
Strongly oppose |
20 |
20 |
21 |
40 |
35 |
17 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 6
INCREASING THE NUMBER OF WIND FARMS
"How much do you favor or oppose a large increase in the
number of wind farms in [the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.]?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
United States |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Unweighted base |
1087 |
1076 |
1045 |
1109 |
1111 |
1020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAVOR (NET) |
87 |
89 |
91 |
90 |
79 |
92 |
|
Strongly favor |
48 |
49 |
64 |
55 |
34 |
61 |
|
Favor more than oppose |
39 |
40 |
27 |
35 |
45 |
31 |
|
OPPOSE (NET) |
13 |
11 |
9 |
10 |
21 |
8 |
|
Oppose more than favor |
9 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
14 |
7 |
|
Strongly oppose |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
1 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 7
GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES FOR BIO-FUELS
"How much do you favor or oppose a financial subsidy by
the government of [the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.] for
bio-fuels?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
United States |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Unweighted base |
1087 |
1076 |
1045 |
1109 |
1111 |
1020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAVOR (NET) |
77 |
84 |
90 |
85 |
65 |
71 |
|
Strongly favor |
23 |
39 |
54 |
38 |
23 |
22 |
|
Favor more than oppose |
55 |
45 |
36 |
47 |
42 |
49 |
|
OPPOSE (NET) |
23 |
16 |
10 |
15 |
35 |
29 |
|
Oppose more than favor |
16 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
21 |
21 |
|
Strongly oppose |
7 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
14 |
8 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 8
GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES FOR NUCLEAR POWER
"How much do you favor or oppose a financial subsidy by
the government of [the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.] for the
development of nuclear power?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults
|
|
Great Britain |
France |
Italy |
Spain |
Germany |
United States |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Unweighted base |
1087 |
1076 |
1045 |
1109 |
1111 |
1020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAVOR (NET) |
42 |
48 |
62 |
36 |
34 |
46 |
|
Strongly favor |
10 |
11 |
30 |
13 |
7 |
12 |
|
Favor more than oppose |
33 |
37 |
32 |
23 |
27 |
35 |
|
OPPOSE (NET) |
58 |
52 |
38 |
64 |
66 |
54 |
|
Oppose more than favor |
38 |
33 |
20 |
35 |
32 |
37 |
|
Strongly oppose |
20 |
19 |
17 |
30 |
34 |
17 |
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
Methodology
This FT/Harris Poll was conducted online by Harris
Interactive among a total of 6,448 adults (aged 16-64) within France (1,076),
Germany (1,111), Great Britain (1,087), Spain (1,109) and the United States
(1,020) and adults (aged 18-64) in Italy (1,045) between 30 January and 8
February 2008. Figures for age, sex, education, region and Internet usage were
weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions
in the population. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for respondents’
propensity to be online.
All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use
probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most
often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage
error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording
and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore,
Harris Interactive avoids the words "margin of error" as they are
misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors
with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100%
response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close
to this ideal.
Respondents for this survey were selected from among those
who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been
weighted to reflect the composition of the adult populations of the respective
countries. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the
Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be
calculated.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of
the National Council on Public Polls and of the British Polling Council.
J6769
Q1920, 1925, 1930, 1935, 1940, 1941, 1945, 1946
|