The Harris Poll® #21, February 26, 2008

Adults in Five Largest European Countries and the U.S. Supportive of Renewable Energy, But Unwilling to Pay Much More for It

As energy costs continue to soar, and an increased reliance on traditional oil and coal is questioned, alternate sources of energy are examined more closely. Many in the five largest countries in Europe and in the United States like the idea of renewable energy, but do not want to pay any more for renewable energy sources. A majority of adults who have some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills in Great Britain (54%) and Germany (50%), pluralities in Italy (44%), France (42%) and the U.S. (40%), as well as just over one-third of adults responsible for paying household energy bills in Spain (35%), all say they would be willing to pay nothing more for energy if it was from renewable sources.

These are some of the results of a Financial Times/Harris Poll conducted online by Harris Interactive® among a total of 6,448 adults aged 16 to 64 within France, Germany, Great Britain, Spain and the United States, and adults aged 18 to 64 in Italy, between January 30 and February 8, 2008.

When this decision of paying more is translated into actual currency, it makes it even less likely that people will be willing to pay more. Using European Commission estimates that it would cost each household an extra €150, £110 or $220 (depending on country) per month to cut greenhouse gasses and get more renewable energy, strong majorities of adults who have some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills in all six countries say they would be not at all likely to pay this extra amount.

Looking at taxes on cars, here majorities favor a higher tax on higher carbon emission cars. From a high of 78 percent of adults favoring this idea in Spain to a low of just over half (53%) of adults favoring it in the U.S., it is a winning idea. An even stronger idea is that of having a lower tax on lower carbon emission cars. At least three-quarters of adults in all six countries favor this idea. In fact, majorities of Italians (53%) and Spaniards (55%) strongly favor lower taxes on lower carbon emitting cars.

Building New Sources of Energy

Looking specifically to two sources of energy – nuclear and wind – majorities of adults in these six countries are in favor of one type and mixed on the other. When it comes to the number of wind farms in their country, strong majorities in all six countries (from 79% to 92%) are in favor of seeing a large increase. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, produces more mixed feelings. A majority of Italians (58%) are in favor of building new nuclear plants in their country. Two-thirds of Spaniards (68%) as well as 64 percent of Germans and just over half (55%) of adults in Great Britain, however, are all opposed to building new power plants in their respective countries. France and the U.S. are more closely divided. In France, 51 percent are opposed while in the U.S., 52 percent favor building new power plants.

Government Subsidies

When it comes to actually having the government create a financial subsidy for the development of nuclear power, the feeling equals those of building new plants. Italians are most supportive, as three in five (62%) are in favor of such a subsidy. Majorities in Germany (66%), Spain (64%), Great Britain (58%) and the U.S. (54%) are all opposed to a subsidy for nuclear power development. Again, France is the most divided as 52 percent oppose this subsidy while 48 percent would be in favor of it. Bio-fuels, however, are a different story. Strong majorities in all six countries (from 65% in Germany to 90% in Italy) would favor a government subsidy for bio-fuels.

So What?

Support for bio-fuels and wind farms is strong across these six countries. But, what is also clear is that while people support renewable electricity, they are not willing to actually pay more for these alternative types of energy. Until people are forced to do so, or the price for renewable energy comes down considerably, people will not make the "green" choice. This is especially true as economies around the globe tighten. When it comes to food or solar power, food will win for the consumer each time.

TABLE 1

PAYING MORE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY

"How much of an increase would you be willing to pay at the most for energy if it were from renewable sources?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults who have some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills

 

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

United States

%

%

%

%

%

%

Unweighted base

884

934

807

848

968

787

Nothing more

54

42

44

35

50

40

5% more

18

25

25

25

22

17

10% more

12

16

15

14

14

17

15% more

2

4

7

4

4

7

20% more

2

2

4

3

2

4

30% more

1

*

*

1

1

2

40% more

1

*

*

1

1

1

Not sure

10

10

5

17

5

11

AVERAGE

3.9%

4.7%

5.1%

5.3%

4.4%

6.1%

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 2

LIKELIHOOD OF PAYING MORE EACH MONTH FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY

"The European Commission estimates it would cost each household an extra [€150, £110, $220] on a monthly basis on gas and electricity bills to cut green house emissions and get more renewable energy. Given the choice, how likely would you be to pay this extra [€150, £110, $220] per month?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults who have some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills

 

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

United States

%

%

%

%

%

%

Unweighted base

884

934

807

848

968

787

Completely likely

2

1

3

3

3

2

Very likely

2

3

6

4

3

4

Fairly likely

11

10

14

10

9

8

Somewhat likely

13

17

20

21

21

16

Not at all likely

72

69

57

62

65

71

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 3

HIGHER TAXES ON HIGHER CARBON EMISSION CARS

"How much do you favor or oppose a higher tax on higher carbon emission cars?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults

 

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

United States

%

%

%

%

%

%

Unweighted base

1087

1076

1045

1109

1111

1020

FAVOR (NET)

65

67

71

78

57

53

Strongly favor

31

31

32

46

20

21

Favor more than oppose

34

37

39

32

37

32

OPPOSE (NET)

35

33

29

22

43

47

Oppose more than favor

23

19

18

14

24

27

Strongly oppose

12

14

11

8

19

20

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 4

LOWER TAXES ON LOWER CARBON EMISSION CARS

"How much do you favor or oppose a lower tax on lower carbon emission cars?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults

 

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

United States

%

%

%

%

%

%

Unweighted base

1087

1076

1045

1109

1111

1020

FAVOR (NET)

86

79

91

90

89

78

Strongly favor

39

34

53

55

44

37

Favor more than oppose

46

44

38

35

45

41

OPPOSE (NET)

14

21

9

10

11

22

Oppose more than favor

11

13

7

5

7

14

Strongly oppose

4

8

3

5

5

8

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 5

BUILDING NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

"How much do you favor or oppose building new nuclear power plants in [the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.]?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults

 

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

United States

%

%

%

%

%

%

Unweighted base

1087

1076

1045

1109

1111

1020

FAVOR (NET)

45

49

58

32

36

52

Strongly favor

13

15

29

12

12

20

Favor more than oppose

32

34

30

20

25

32

OPPOSE (NET)

55

51

42

68

64

48

Oppose more than favor

35

31

21

28

29

31

Strongly oppose

20

20

21

40

35

17

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 6

INCREASING THE NUMBER OF WIND FARMS

"How much do you favor or oppose a large increase in the number of wind farms in [the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.]?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults

 

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

United States

%

%

%

%

%

%

Unweighted base

1087

1076

1045

1109

1111

1020

FAVOR (NET)

87

89

91

90

79

92

Strongly favor

48

49

64

55

34

61

Favor more than oppose

39

40

27

35

45

31

OPPOSE (NET)

13

11

9

10

21

8

Oppose more than favor

9

8

8

7

14

7

Strongly oppose

4

3

2

3

7

1

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 7

GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES FOR BIO-FUELS

"How much do you favor or oppose a financial subsidy by the government of [the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.] for bio-fuels?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults

 

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

United States

%

%

%

%

%

%

Unweighted base

1087

1076

1045

1109

1111

1020

FAVOR (NET)

77

84

90

85

65

71

Strongly favor

23

39

54

38

23

22

Favor more than oppose

55

45

36

47

42

49

OPPOSE (NET)

23

16

10

15

35

29

Oppose more than favor

16

10

8

10

21

21

Strongly oppose

7

6

2

5

14

8

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

TABLE 8

GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES FOR NUCLEAR POWER

"How much do you favor or oppose a financial subsidy by the government of [the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.] for the development of nuclear power?"

Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults

 

 

Great Britain

France

Italy

Spain

Germany

United States

%

%

%

%

%

%

Unweighted base

1087

1076

1045

1109

1111

1020

FAVOR (NET)

42

48

62

36

34

46

Strongly favor

10

11

30

13

7

12

Favor more than oppose

33

37

32

23

27

35

OPPOSE (NET)

58

52

38

64

66

54

Oppose more than favor

38

33

20

35

32

37

Strongly oppose

20

19

17

30

34

17

Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

Methodology

This FT/Harris Poll was conducted online by Harris Interactive among a total of 6,448 adults (aged 16-64) within France (1,076), Germany (1,111), Great Britain (1,087), Spain (1,109) and the United States (1,020) and adults (aged 18-64) in Italy (1,045) between 30 January and 8 February 2008. Figures for age, sex, education, region and Internet usage were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.

All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words "margin of error" as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.

Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the adult populations of the respective countries. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.

These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls and of the British Polling Council.

J6769

Q1920, 1925, 1930, 1935, 1940, 1941, 1945, 1946



©2008, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited without the express written permission of Harris Interactive.



Print
Printer Friendly Version of this Release

Follow The Harris Poll on:
twitter

Subscribe to Over the Wire – Weblog commentary of research data on current events and social trends
Sign-up for Harris Poll Weekly
About The Harris Poll
The Harris Poll by Date
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Financial Times / Harris Poll
Search The Harris Poll Library
News Room
PRIVACYSURVEY DEMOESOMAR 26 QUESTIONSJOIN OUR PANELSITE MAPSEARCH

©2009 Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.