|
The Harris Poll®
#25, March 10, 2008
More Than Half of Americans Never Read Political Blogs
Republican Blog Readers More Likely Than Democrats to Believe
Blogs are More Accurate and Valuable Than Mainstream Media
For every political persuasion, it seems like there is at
least a handful of political blogs which chart attitudes and opinions on
campaigns, issues and candidates relevant to that political leaning. One always
hears about a blog breaking news before the "mainstream media"
actually covers it. But are people really reading these blogs? The answer is no,
as over half of Americans (56%) say they never read blogs that discuss politics.
Just under one-quarter (23%) say that they read them several times a year and
just 22 percent of Americans read blogs regularly (several times a month or
more).
These are some of the results of a nationwide Harris Poll of
2,302 U.S. adults surveyed online between January 15 and 22, 2008 by Harris
Interactive®.
While it could be said that blogs are just a younger person’s
folly, in our study this is not the case. Just nineteen percent of Echo Boomers (those aged 18-31) regularly read a political blog and only 17 percent of Gen Xers (those aged 32-43) say the same. Matures (those aged 63 and older) are
actually the generation most likely to be political blog readers as just over
one-quarter (26%) say they regularly do so followed by 23 percent of Baby
Boomers (those aged 44-62). Also, one hears of the rabid blogs on both sides of
the political aisle, but just 22 percent of Republicans and 20 percent of
Democrats regularly read blogs. Independents are the ones slightly more likely
to read these, as just over one-quarter (26%) say they regularly read political
blogs.
Looking at those who regularly do read political blogs, over
half (54%) read one or two at least once a week with an additional 22 percent
reading 3-4 at least once a week. And, while they may read these, they do not
comment on them. Over two-thirds (69%) of those who regularly read blogs did not
comment on one in the previous week. Republicans are slightly more likely than
Democrats to comment. One-third of Republicans (34%) commented in the previous
week compared to 28 percent of Democrats.
Perception of Blogs
One of the criticisms about blogs is their accuracy. Since
anyone can write a blog or comment on one, there is no sense of fact checking.
Well, only one in five (22%) regular blog readers say the information they read
on blogs is less accurate when compared to the mainstream media while three in
ten (30%) say it is more accurate and almost half (48%) say just as accurate.
Besides accuracy, there is also a value issue. When compared to the mainstream
media, one-third of regular blog readers (33%) say the information they read on
blogs is more valuable, half (49%) say just as valuable and just 18 percent say
it is less valuable. Republicans are more likely to find value (41%) and
accuracy (37%) in the information they read on blogs than Democrats are (25% and
21% respectively).
So What?
With the bruising primary season so far, one would think that
political blogs would be a logical place for many Americans to turn to for more
information, but this is obviously not the case. Much was made of the power of
the blogs in 2004 – for both Republicans and Democrats, and, as the campaign
season changes from the primary into the general, this could still be what
happens. Or, maybe the novelty of blogs has faded. As the cable news channels
all have seen their viewership rise with each passing debate, primary and
caucus, maybe political news watchers are leaving the Internet for their
political information and going back to television.
TABLE 1
READERSHIP OF POLITICAL BLOGS
"Thinking specifically of one type of source, how often
do you read online journals, web logs or blogs that discuss politics?"
Base: All adults
| |
Total |
Generation |
Political Party |
|
Echo Boomers (!8-31) |
Gen X (32-43) |
Baby Boomers (44-62) |
Matures (63+) |
Rep. |
Dem. |
Ind. |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
REGULARLY READ BLOGS (NET) |
22 |
19 |
17 |
23 |
26 |
22 |
20 |
26 |
|
Daily |
4 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
|
Several times a week |
7 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
10 |
8 |
6 |
8 |
|
Several times a month |
10 |
11 |
8 |
11 |
11 |
9 |
10 |
13 |
|
Several times a year |
23 |
29 |
22 |
21 |
20 |
19 |
26 |
25 |
|
Never |
56 |
51 |
61 |
56 |
54 |
59 |
53 |
49 |
Note: Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 2
NUMBER OF POLITICAL BLOGS READ
"How many online journals, web logs, or blogs that
discuss politics do you read at least once a week?"
Base: Regularly read blogs
| |
Total |
Political Party |
|
Republican |
Democrat |
Independent |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
1 |
30 |
26 |
31 |
32 |
|
2 |
24 |
26 |
19 |
27 |
|
3 – 4 |
22 |
22 |
28 |
20 |
|
5 – 9 |
17 |
18 |
17 |
15 |
|
10+ |
6 |
8 |
5 |
7 |
Note: Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 3
COMMENTING ON POLITICAL BLOGS
"Within the last week, how often have you commented on or
posted material to an online journal, web log or blog?"
Base: Regularly read blogs
| |
Total |
Political Party |
|
Republican |
Democrat |
Independent |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
0 |
69 |
66 |
72 |
70 |
|
More than 1 (NET) |
31 |
34 |
28 |
30 |
|
1 |
14 |
9 |
16 |
16 |
|
2 – 4 |
9 |
12 |
8 |
6 |
|
5 – 9 |
5 |
8 |
2 |
5 |
|
10+ |
3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
Note: Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 4
ACCURACY OF POLITICAL BLOGS
"Compared to the mainstream news media, the information I
read online journals, web logs or blogs is…?"
Base: Regularly read blogs
| |
Total |
Political Party |
|
Republican |
Democrat |
Independent |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
ACCURATE (NET) |
30 |
37 |
21 |
36 |
|
Much more accurate |
4 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
|
More accurate |
26 |
32 |
19 |
31 |
|
About as accurate |
48 |
49 |
48 |
45 |
|
LESS ACCURATE (NET) |
22 |
14 |
32 |
19 |
|
Less accurate |
20 |
12 |
31 |
15 |
|
Much less accurate |
2 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
Note: Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding
TABLE 5
VALUE OF POLITICAL BLOGS
"Compared to the mainstream news media, the information I
read online journals, web logs or blogs is…?"
Base: Regularly read blogs
| |
Total |
Political Party |
|
Republican |
Democrat |
Independent |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
VALUABLE (NET) |
33 |
41 |
25 |
37 |
|
Much more valuable |
9 |
10 |
6 |
12 |
|
More valuable |
24 |
31 |
19 |
25 |
|
About as valuable |
49 |
42 |
52 |
50 |
|
LESS VALUABLE (NET) |
18 |
17 |
23 |
14 |
|
Less valuable |
16 |
15 |
22 |
12 |
|
Much less valuable |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Note: Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding
Methodology
This Harris Poll® was conducted online within the
United States January 15 and 22, 2008, among 2,302 adults (aged 18 and over).
Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region and household income
were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual
proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to
adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.
All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use
probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most
often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage
error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording
and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore,
Harris Interactive avoids the words "margin of error" as they are
misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors
with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100
percent response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls
come close to this ideal.
Respondents for this survey were selected from among those
who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been
weighted to reflect the composition of the adult population. Because the sample
is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no
estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of
the National Council on Public Polls.
J33083
Q560, 565, 570, 575, 578
|