New Survey Shows Public Perception of Opportunity to Participate in Clinical Trials Has Decreased Slightly From Last Year

Fewer adults participate or plan to participate in trials for financial benefits and many of those who have ever participated rely on the advice of their regular physician

ROCHESTER, N.Y. – June 27, 2005 – This issue of Harris Interactive Healthcare News focuses on public perceptions of clinical research studies. The results shown here are from a Harris Interactive® survey conducted online from April 19 to 26, 2005 among a cross section of 2,261 U.S. adults aged 18 and over.

Opportunity and Participation in Clinical Research Studies

Today, one in ten (10%) adults indicate they have participated in a clinical trial, virtually unchanged since 2001(8% in 2001, 10% in 2003, 11% in 2004).

After a slight increase in the percentages of adults who say they have had the opportunity to participate in clinical trials from 2001 to 2004, opportunity to participate has fallen off slightly as 15 percent of adults today report having had the opportunity to participate in a clinical research study (compared to 19% in 2004). While the change here is very small, and could be the result of sampling or measurement error, it may also be the beginning of a new trend and leveling out of perceived opportunities for participation in clinical studies.

Table 1

PARTICIPATED/HAD OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY

Base: All Adults

20011

20032

20043*

2005*

%

%

%

%

Those who ever had the opportunity to participate in a clinical research study

13

16

19

15

Those who ever participated in a clinical research study

8

10

11

10

* The survey used the words "clinical research study" rather than "clinical trial" because the word "trial" has sometimes inhibited participation.

1 2001 data is from the "Will & Why Survey" conducted online in June 2001 by Harris Interactive among a nationwide sample of 5,348 U.S. adults aged 18 and over.

2 2003 data is from Harris Interactive Healthcare News, Volume 3, Issue 10, June 16, 2003.

3 2004 data is from Harris Interactive Healthcare News, Volume 4, Issue 10, June 11, 2004.

Reasons for Participation

Those who have participated in clinical trials indicate a range of reasons for their participation. While these vary slightly in magnitude from year to year, the top response has continued to remain the same since 2001 – about half (51%) indicate that they participate in clinical studies to advance medicine and science.

The overall order of the reasons has retained a similar pattern; however, in 2005 there are some notable changes. There is an increase in those who indicated their doctor recommended the study as a reason they decided to participate in a clinical research study (31% now compared to 21% in 2004). Additionally there are several key decreases in both the financial benefits and education and media coverage areas:

  • More than one-third (36%) of adults who participated in clinical trials said they did so to earn extra money, down from 50 percent in 2004.
  • One in five (19%) participated to obtain free medication, down from 27 percent in 2004.
  • Thirty percent (30%) participated to obtain education about treatment/improving their health, a decrease of nine percentage points from 2004 (39%).
  • One-quarter (25%) indicated they participated in clinical studies because the information they read, saw or had heard about the study influenced them, down from 41 percent in 2004.

Table 2

Reasons for Participating in clinical research study

"Please indicate which of the following, if any, are reasons you decided to participate in a clinical research study. Please select all that apply."

Base: Have ever participated in a clinical research study

2001

2003

2004

2005*

%

%

%

%

To advance medicine/science

55

54

56

51

To obtain better treatment for my condition

56

40

44

46

To help others with the condition

47

46

45

39

To earn extra money

51

42

50

36

My doctor recommended the study

24

25

21

31

To obtain education about treatment/improving my health

33

37

39

30

I was curious about the specifics of the study

29

23

32

26

The information I read, saw, or had heard about the study influenced me

28

36

41

25

To obtain free medication

25

24

27

19

Family recommended the study

NA

NA

13

8

Friend recommended the study

NA

NA

NA*

5

I have a life-threatening illness

16

5

7

5

There were no other treatment options available

NA

NA

7

4

If I knew someone else who had the condition being studied

NA

NA

1

7

Other

NA

NA

11

6

There were no reasons in particular

NA

NA

NA

1

Note: Multiple-response question.

* Family/Friend recommended the study was a combined question in 2004.

NA = Not Asked

It appears that the draw of financial benefits attached to clinical studies may be waning for participants, and the recommendations by doctors may be a growing influence to participation. While last year the media coverage was critical to participants, this year it may be more of a liability. This may stem from recent public controversy over the potentially dangerous side effects of certain prescription drugs and, on a larger scale, more coverage of clinical studies in general and of the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). Over half of all respondents (55%) and nearly two-thirds (64%) of those who have previously participated in a clinical study believe that pharmaceutical companies’ reputations have been most affected (compared to the FDA, pharmacies, doctors, and clinical studies in general) by the recent events surrounding various prescription drugs such as Vioxx, Celebrex and Naproxen.

Table 3

Recent Media Coverage

"There have been recent reports of potentially dangerous side effects related to some frequently used prescription drugs, such as Vioxx, Celebrex and Naproxen. In your opinion, whose reputation has been most affected by these events?"

Base: All Adults

All Adults

Adults Who Have Participated in a Clinical Study

%

%

Pharmaceutical companies

55

64

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

26

18

Clinical studies in general

4

4

Doctors

2

3

Pharmacies

2

4

None of these

3

3

Not sure

8

4

Factors That Would Influence More People to Participate

Those who said they would consider participating in a clinical research study in the future also cite a variety of reasons. Again, the majority of the top reasons cited this year remain the same as in 2004.

Factors that are "very likely" to influence majorities of those who are considering participation in clinical research studies include:

  • If I had a terminal illness (72%)
  • If I thought the drug might cure me (67%)
  • If there were no other medical options available to me (66%)
  • If I knew there were no risks involved (61%)
  • If I thought the drug/treatment would help me (61%)
  • The treatment were free of charge to me (53%).

Smaller, but still substantial groups, indicated they were very likely to participate in the following scenarios:

  • If my doctor recommended it (47%)
  • If I received money for participating (46%)
  • If I knew the risks associated with the treatment (45%)
  • If I thought the drug/treatment would help someone else in the future (45%)
  • If it were convenient for me to participate (43%)
  • If the location were convenient for me (43%)
  • If there were minimal side effects associated with the treatment (43%).

The financial connection to clinical research studies is declining as a motivation of potential new subjects, as well. While money is a factor for about half of those who would consider participating, it has fallen significantly both in terms of free treatment (53% now compared to 64% in 2004) and money for participating (46% now compared to 56% in 2004).

The primary reasons for considering participation in clinical research studies are still centered on the person themselves and their conditions and medical options.

Table 4

FACTORS LIKELY TO INFLUENCE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY

"On a scale from 1-5, with 1 being "Not likely" and 5 being "Very likely", please rate the factors below on their likeliness to influence your decision to participate in a clinical research study."

Percent saying "5" ("very likely")

Base: Would consider participating in a clinical research study

2004

2005

%

%

If I had a terminal illness

72

72

If I thought the drug might cure me

71

67

If there were no other medical options available to me

67

66

If I knew there were no risks involved

67

61

If I thought the drug/treatment would help me

57

61

If the treatment were free of charge to me

64

53

If my doctor recommended it

54

47

If I received money for participating

56

46

If I knew the risks associated with the treatment

49

45

If I thought the drug/treatment would help someone else in the future

NA

45

If it were convenient for me to participate

53

43

If the location were convenient for me

54

43

If there were minimal side effects associated with the treatment

48

43

If I knew that I would receive an active drug and not a sugar pill (placebo)

37

33

If I knew someone else who had the condition being studied

NA

30

If I had a condition other than a terminal illness

36

29

If I already take a drug/treatment made by the pharmaceutical company sponsoring the study

NA

28

NA = Not Asked

Informed Consent Process

The overwhelming majority of adults who have participated in clinical trials have very positive views of the informed consent process. Large majorities strongly agree that they understood participation was voluntary (84%) and that they were agreeing to participate in a clinical research study (83%). Three-quarters or more of participants understood what was required of them (78%); knew they could stop participating at any time (75%); and felt comfortable asking additional questions regarding the study (75%). Substantial majorities also felt secure that their confidentiality was protected (69%) and that they were made aware of both the benefits (68%) and risks (65%) to participation.

Similar to last year, most participants found the purpose of the study to be clear after reading the informed consent (85%) and agreed that their questions were generally answered by the study team regarding the informed consent process (80%).

Table 5

Informed Consent Process Views

"The following statements describe how well the process was explained to you when you agreed to be part of the clinical research study. Using the scale below, please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the statements below."

Percent saying "strongly agree"

Base: Have ever participated in a clinical research study

2004

2005

%

%

I understood that participation was voluntary.

90

84

I understood that I was agreeing to participate in a clinical research study.

89

83

I fully understood what was required of me (number of visits, how long the study lasted, etc.).

81

78

I knew I could stop participating in the study at any time.

79

75

I felt comfortable asking additional questions regarding the study.

79

75

I was assured confidentiality of all personal information that I provided, with the exception of those allowed by federal law.

73

73

I felt secure that my confidentiality was protected throughout the study.

71

69

I was made aware of the benefits involved in participating in the clinical research study.

74

68

I was made aware of the risks involved in participating in the clinical research study.

74

65

I understood that I could choose other treatment options, including no treatment at all.

66

63

The informed consent document was easy to read and understand.

60

61

Table 6

Overview of Informed Consent Process

Base: Have ever participated in a clinical research study

%

Said purpose of the study was "clear" after reading the informed consent

85

Agreed their questions were answered by the study team regarding the informed consent process

80

Said the study coordinator conducted the informed consent process.

54

Read the informed consent by themselves

48

Influences and Experiences of Former Participants

Participation in clinical studies appears to be a positive experience for those involved. Most of those who participated in a study would do so again, if given that chance (84%). Furthermore, a strong majority of participants (81%) describe their appointments at the study site as "not at all stressful."

Physicians play an important role in a person’s decision to participate in a clinical research study. More than one-quarter (27%) of those who participated in a study said that their physician was their main influence in deciding to participate. Additionally, 79 percent of adults who are willing to participate in a clinical research study with an unfamiliar physician or those who are not sure indicate that they would be very or somewhat likely to check with their regular physician before participating in a clinical research study he/she is not conducting. Finally, nearly half (45%) of those who have ever participated in a clinical research study indicate that they learned everything they needed to know from the doctor/study team before deciding whether or not to participate.

Table 7

Sources of Influence

Base: Have ever participated in a clinical study

%

Described their appointments at the study site as "Not at All Stressful"

81

Main influence in the decision to participate in a clinical research study:
  • No one other than myself
  • Physician (PCP, Study Dr., Other Dr.)
  • 38

  • 27

Would be very or somewhat likely to consult with their regular physician before agreeing to participate in a clinical research study that he/she is not conducting. (Base: Those willing to participate in a clinical research study with an unfamiliar physician or those who are not sure)

79

Said "I learned everything I need to know from the physician/study team conducting the study"

45

Said "I would participate in another clinical research study"

84

Public Perceptions of Clinical Research Studies

Most adults agree that people who participate in clinical research studies are making a contribution to science (86%), are part of an experiment to test medications/treatments not already available to the public (79%), and that they learn more about their condition and health in general (76%). Smaller majorities agree that people who participate in studies have a chance to get free medicine (65%) and do not have to pay for their medical care (53%). About half of respondents agree that participants in clinical studies are taking a gamble with their health (49%) and are treated like guinea pigs (46%).

Table 8

AGREE/DISAGREE WITH STATEMENTS ABOUT PEOPLE WHO PARTICIPATE IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES

"The following statements describe how some people feel about clinical research studies. Using the scale below, please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the statements below. People who participate in clinical research studies…."

Percent saying "strongly agree" or "somewhat agree"

Base: All Adults

%

Are making a contribution to science

86

Are part of an experiment to test medications/treatments not already available to the public

79

Learn more about their condition and health in general

76

Have a chance to get free medicine

65

Do not have to pay for their medical care

53

Are taking a gamble with their health

49

Get the best possible treatment

48

Are like guinea pigs

46

Have access to the best physicians

46

Spend a lot of time at the doctor's office

34

Are part of an experiment to test medications/treatments already available to the public

33

The public sees the greatest risks to participating in clinical studies to be possible side effects (47%) and health risks (32%) and sees the greatest benefits as helping to advance science and find a cure for diseases/conditions (36%) and helping to save lives (24%).

TABLE 9

CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY RISKS

"Which of the following do you consider to be the greatest risk of participating in a clinical research study?"

Base: All Adults

%

Possible side effects

47

Health risks

32

Unproven therapy

9

Receiving a placebo(sugar pill)

5

Privacy concerns

2

Other

1

None; I do not believe there are any risks.

4

Note: Single-response question.

TABLE 10

CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY BENEFITS

"Which of the following do you consider to be the greatest benefit of clinical research studies?"

Base: All Adults

%

Help advance science and find a cure for diseases/conditions

36

May help to save lives

24

May help me with my condition

17

Allow medical team to find a more effective treatment

11

Monetary compensation (money) is provided

4

Allows me to help others with the condition

3

Provide information on current medications

1

Free medication is provided

1

Other

1

None; I do not believe there are any benefits.

2

Note: Single-response question.

Learn About Clinical Studies

While nearly two in five (38%) adults say the media is their main source of receiving information about clinical research studies and most (83%) understand what clinical research studies are, half (51%) of all adults indicate they would prefer to learn about clinical research studies from their regular physician.

Table 11

Clinical Information Obtained

Base: All Adults

2004

2005

%

%

Understand what is meant by "clinical research study" also known as "clinical trial"

79

83

Media (TV, radio, newspaper, magazine) main source of receiving information about clinical research studies

44

38

Would prefer to learn about clinical research opportunities from their regular/usual physician

NA

51

NA = Not Asked

Online Clinical Trial Registries

Initial reaction to online clinical trial registries is somewhat skeptical with 20 percent of adults indicating they would be not at all likely to use the service.

That said, majorities of respondents feel that all types of clinical trials should be listed in the registries (73%) and that all results, regardless of success, should be available in these registries (79%). There is mixed reaction on how to present the results with 41 percent believing the results should be in easy-to-understand layman’s terms and 34 percent believing they should be in both layman’s terms and scientific terms. There is also no consensus on the purpose of these registries although most ideas center on information sharing, with 40 percent saying their purpose is to promote research, 36 percent saying it is to increase awareness of clinical trials and 32 percent saying it is to share experiences of clinical trials.

Table 12

Online Clinical Registry Reaction

Base: All Adults

%

Likelihood to use an online clinical trial registry:

- Extremely, very and fairly likely (Net)

- Not at all likely

44

20

Think all types of clinical trials should be listed in the registries

73

Think all clinical trial results, regardless of success, should be available in these registries

79

Results should be presented:

  • Easy to understand layman’s terms
  • Both laymen terms and in scientific terms

41

34

Primary Goals of Online Clinical Trial Registries:

  • Promote Research
  • Increase awareness of trials
  • Share clinical trial experiences
  • Central location tracking/ reviewing study results
  • Resource to collect feedback from general population/professionals

  • 40

  • 36

  • 32

  • 29

  • 25

Physician/Pharmaceutical Involvement in Clinical Research

Most people (72%) believe that physician interest in finding new and better treatments is "very important" to physicians conducting clinical research. Furthermore, 59 percent rated "patients who have no other treatment alternatives" as "very important" to physicians conducting clinical research.

Fewer people believe that fame and recognition (16%), getting a scientific paper published (20%) or receiving money from drug companies (27%) are very important to physicians conducting clinical research. These patterns are consistent with 2004 results.

Table 13

Physician Involvement

"Please rate how important you think each of the following is to physicians conducting clinical research."

(Percent saying "very important")

Base: All Adults

2004

2005

%

%

Finding new and better treatments

80

72

Helping patients who have no other treatment alternatives

NA

59

Bringing fame and recognition to the physician’s medical center

17

16

Getting a scientific paper published

22

20

Receiving money from drug companies

29

27

NA = Not Asked

A majority of respondents (62%) rate "receiving money from drug sales" as "very important" to pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical research while more than half (57%) believe that finding new and better treatments is "very important" to pharmaceutical companies conducting research studies.

Table 14

Pharmaceutical Involvement

"Please rate how important you think each of the following is to pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical research."

(Percent saying "very important")

Base: All Adults

%

Receiving money from drug sales

62

Finding new and better treatments

57

Bringing fame and recognition to the pharmaceutical company

47

Helping patients who have no other treatment alternatives

38

Getting a scientific paper published

29

Conclusions

Overall public opinion in relation to clinical research studies appears similar to last year. However, there are a few very notable differences. There is a slight reduction in the number of adults who have had the opportunity to participate in clinical research studies. The allure of financial benefits appears to be less of a draw to both those who have participated in the past and those who are considering it in the future. For those who have participated in clinical research studies, the involvement of their physician appears to be important. Public perceptions of clinical research studies remain similar to past years and the public is still gathering most of their information from the media. The public appears skeptical to the initial introduction of online clinical trial registries for themselves, but they are open to the information sharing they could provide.

Downloadable PDFs of the Harris Interactive Healthcare News are available at http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters_healthcare.asp

Methodology
This survey was conducted online within the United States between April 19 and 26, 2005 among a nationwide cross section of 2,261 adults (aged 18 and over). Data were weighted for age, education, income, gender, race/ethnicity and region where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.

In theory, with probability samples of this size, one could say with 95 percent certainty that the results from the total sample have a sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points of what they would be if the entire U.S. adult population had been polled with complete accuracy. Sampling error for the sub-samples of those who have participated in a clinical research study (261), those who would consider participating in a clinical research study (1,525), and those willing to participate in a clinical research study with an unfamiliar physician or those who are not sure (2,118) is higher and varies. Unfortunately, there are several other possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include refusals to be interviewed (nonresponse), question wording and question order, and weighting. It is impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these factors. These online samples were not probability samples.

These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.

About Harris Interactive®

Harris Interactive Inc. (www.harrisinteractive.com), the 15th largest and fastest-growing market research firm in the world, is a Rochester, NY-based global research company that blends premier strategic consulting with innovative and efficient methods of investigation, analysis and application. Known for The Harris Poll® and for pioneering Internet-based research methods, Harris Interactive conducts proprietary and public research to help its clients achieve clear, material and enduring results.

Harris Interactive combines its intellectual capital, databases and technology to advance market leadership through its U.S. offices and wholly owned subsidiaries, HI Europe in London (www.hieurope.com), Novatris in Paris (www.novatris.com), and through an independent global network of affiliate market research companies. EOE M/F/D/V.

To become a member of the Harris Poll OnlineSM and be invited to participate in future online surveys, www.harrispollonline.com.

Press Contacts:

Nancy Wong
Harris Interactive
585-214-7316

Kelly Gullo
Harris Interactive
585-214-7172

News by Date
2009
2008
2007
2006
The Harris Poll
Financial Times / Harris Poll
Events
Newsletters
Media Coverage
Client News
Media Resources
Search News Room



Print
PRIVACYSURVEY DEMOESOMAR 26 QUESTIONSJOIN OUR PANELSITE MAPSEARCH

©2009 Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.