New Survey Shows Public Perception of Opportunity to
Participate in Clinical Trials Has Decreased Slightly From Last Year
Fewer adults participate or plan to participate in trials for
financial benefits and many of those who have ever participated rely on the
advice of their regular physician
ROCHESTER, N.Y. – June 27, 2005 – This issue of Harris Interactive Healthcare
News focuses on public perceptions of clinical research studies. The results
shown here are from a Harris Interactive® survey conducted online
from April 19 to 26, 2005 among a cross section of 2,261 U.S. adults aged 18 and
over.
Opportunity and Participation in Clinical Research Studies
Today, one in ten (10%) adults indicate they have participated in a clinical
trial, virtually unchanged since 2001(8% in 2001, 10% in 2003, 11% in 2004).
After a slight increase in the percentages of adults who say they have had
the opportunity to participate in clinical trials from 2001 to 2004, opportunity
to participate has fallen off slightly as 15 percent of adults today report
having had the opportunity to participate in a clinical research study (compared
to 19% in 2004). While the change here is very small, and could be the result of
sampling or measurement error, it may also be the beginning of a new trend and
leveling out of perceived opportunities for participation in clinical studies.
Table 1
PARTICIPATED/HAD OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN CLINICAL
RESEARCH STUDY
Base: All Adults
| |
20011 |
20032 |
20043* |
2005* |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Those who ever had the opportunity to participate in a clinical
research study |
13 |
16 |
19 |
15 |
|
Those who ever participated in a clinical research study |
8 |
10 |
11 |
10 |
* The survey used the words "clinical research study" rather than
"clinical trial" because the word "trial" has sometimes
inhibited participation.
1 2001 data is from the "Will & Why Survey" conducted
online in June 2001 by Harris Interactive among a nationwide sample of 5,348
U.S. adults aged 18 and over.
2 2003 data is from Harris Interactive Healthcare News, Volume
3, Issue 10, June 16, 2003.
3 2004 data is from Harris Interactive Healthcare News, Volume
4, Issue 10, June 11, 2004.
Reasons for Participation
Those who have participated in clinical trials indicate a range of reasons
for their participation. While these vary slightly in magnitude from year to
year, the top response has continued to remain the same since 2001 – about
half (51%) indicate that they participate in clinical studies to advance
medicine and science.
The overall order of the reasons has retained a similar pattern; however, in
2005 there are some notable changes. There is an increase in those who indicated
their doctor recommended the study as a reason they decided to participate in a
clinical research study (31% now compared to 21% in 2004). Additionally there
are several key decreases in both the financial benefits and education and media
coverage areas:
- More than one-third (36%) of adults who participated in clinical trials
said they did so to earn extra money, down from 50 percent in 2004.
- One in five (19%) participated to obtain free medication, down from 27
percent in 2004.
- Thirty percent (30%) participated to obtain education about
treatment/improving their health, a decrease of nine percentage points from
2004 (39%).
- One-quarter (25%) indicated they participated in clinical studies because
the information they read, saw or had heard about the study influenced them,
down from 41 percent in 2004.
Table 2
Reasons for Participating in clinical research study
"Please indicate which of the following, if any, are
reasons you decided to participate in a clinical research study. Please select
all that apply."
Base: Have ever participated in a clinical research study
| |
2001 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005* |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
To advance medicine/science |
55 |
54 |
56 |
51 |
|
To obtain better treatment for my condition |
56 |
40 |
44 |
46 |
|
To help others with the condition |
47 |
46 |
45 |
39 |
|
To earn extra money |
51 |
42 |
50 |
36 |
|
My doctor recommended the study |
24 |
25 |
21 |
31 |
|
To obtain education about treatment/improving my health |
33 |
37 |
39 |
30 |
|
I was curious about the specifics of the study |
29 |
23 |
32 |
26 |
|
The information I read, saw, or had heard about the study influenced me |
28 |
36 |
41 |
25 |
|
To obtain free medication |
25 |
24 |
27 |
19 |
|
Family recommended the study |
NA |
NA |
13 |
8 |
|
Friend recommended the study |
NA |
NA |
NA* |
5 |
|
I have a life-threatening illness |
16 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
|
There were no other treatment options available |
NA |
NA |
7 |
4 |
|
If I knew someone else who had the condition being studied |
NA |
NA |
1 |
7 |
|
Other |
NA |
NA |
11 |
6 |
|
There were no reasons in particular |
NA |
NA |
NA |
1 |
Note: Multiple-response question.
* Family/Friend recommended the study was a combined question in 2004.
NA = Not Asked
It appears that the draw of financial benefits attached to clinical studies
may be waning for participants, and the recommendations by doctors may be a
growing influence to participation. While last year the media coverage was
critical to participants, this year it may be more of a liability. This may stem
from recent public controversy over the potentially dangerous side effects of
certain prescription drugs and, on a larger scale, more coverage of clinical
studies in general and of the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). Over half
of all respondents (55%) and nearly two-thirds (64%) of those who have
previously participated in a clinical study believe that pharmaceutical
companies’ reputations have been most affected (compared to the FDA,
pharmacies, doctors, and clinical studies in general) by the recent events
surrounding various prescription drugs such as Vioxx, Celebrex and Naproxen.
Table 3
Recent Media Coverage
"There have been recent reports of potentially dangerous
side effects related to some frequently used prescription drugs, such as Vioxx,
Celebrex and Naproxen. In your opinion, whose reputation has been most affected
by these events?"
Base: All Adults
| |
All Adults |
Adults Who Have Participated in a Clinical Study |
| |
% |
% |
|
Pharmaceutical companies |
55 |
64 |
|
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) |
26 |
18 |
|
Clinical studies in general |
4 |
4 |
|
Doctors |
2 |
3 |
|
Pharmacies |
2 |
4 |
|
None of these |
3 |
3 |
|
Not sure |
8 |
4 |
Factors That Would Influence More People to Participate
Those who said they would consider participating in a clinical research study
in the future also cite a variety of reasons. Again, the majority of the top
reasons cited this year remain the same as in 2004.
Factors that are "very likely" to influence majorities of those who
are considering participation in clinical research studies include:
- If I had a terminal illness (72%)
- If I thought the drug might cure me (67%)
- If there were no other medical options available to me (66%)
- If I knew there were no risks involved (61%)
- If I thought the drug/treatment would help me (61%)
- The treatment were free of charge to me (53%).
Smaller, but still substantial groups, indicated they were very likely to
participate in the following scenarios:
- If my doctor recommended it (47%)
- If I received money for participating (46%)
- If I knew the risks associated with the treatment (45%)
- If I thought the drug/treatment would help someone else in the future
(45%)
- If it were convenient for me to participate (43%)
- If the location were convenient for me (43%)
- If there were minimal side effects associated with the treatment (43%).
The financial connection to clinical research studies is declining as a
motivation of potential new subjects, as well. While money is a factor for about
half of those who would consider participating, it has fallen significantly both
in terms of free treatment (53% now compared to 64% in 2004) and money for
participating (46% now compared to 56% in 2004).
The primary reasons for considering participation in clinical research
studies are still centered on the person themselves and their conditions and
medical options.
Table 4
FACTORS LIKELY TO INFLUENCE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY
"On a scale from 1-5, with 1 being "Not likely"
and 5 being "Very likely", please rate the factors below on their
likeliness to influence your decision to participate in a clinical research
study."
Percent saying "5" ("very likely")
Base: Would consider participating in a clinical research study
| |
2004 |
2005 |
| |
% |
% |
|
If I had a terminal illness |
72 |
72 |
|
If I thought the drug might cure me |
71 |
67 |
|
If there were no other medical options available to me |
67 |
66 |
|
If I knew there were no risks involved |
67 |
61 |
|
If I thought the drug/treatment would help me |
57 |
61 |
|
If the treatment were free of charge to me |
64 |
53 |
|
If my doctor recommended it |
54 |
47 |
|
If I received money for participating |
56 |
46 |
|
If I knew the risks associated with the treatment |
49 |
45 |
|
If I thought the drug/treatment would help someone else in the future |
NA |
45 |
|
If it were convenient for me to participate |
53 |
43 |
|
If the location were convenient for me |
54 |
43 |
|
If there were minimal side effects associated with the treatment |
48 |
43 |
|
If I knew that I would receive an active drug and not a sugar pill
(placebo) |
37 |
33 |
|
If I knew someone else who had the condition being studied |
NA |
30 |
|
If I had a condition other than a terminal illness |
36 |
29 |
|
If I already take a drug/treatment made by the pharmaceutical company
sponsoring the study |
NA |
28 |
NA = Not Asked
Informed Consent Process
The overwhelming majority of adults who have participated in clinical trials
have very positive views of the informed consent process. Large majorities
strongly agree that they understood participation was voluntary (84%) and that
they were agreeing to participate in a clinical research study (83%).
Three-quarters or more of participants understood what was required of them
(78%); knew they could stop participating at any time (75%); and felt
comfortable asking additional questions regarding the study (75%). Substantial
majorities also felt secure that their confidentiality was protected (69%) and
that they were made aware of both the benefits (68%) and risks (65%) to
participation.
Similar to last year, most participants found the purpose of the study to be
clear after reading the informed consent (85%) and agreed that their questions
were generally answered by the study team regarding the informed consent process
(80%).
Table 5
Informed Consent Process Views
"The following statements describe how well the process
was explained to you when you agreed to be part of the clinical research study.
Using the scale below, please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with
the statements below."
Percent saying "strongly agree"
Base: Have ever participated in a clinical research study
| |
2004 |
2005 |
| |
% |
% |
|
I understood that participation was voluntary. |
90 |
84 |
|
I understood that I was agreeing to participate in a clinical
research study. |
89 |
83 |
|
I fully understood what was required of me (number of visits, how
long the study lasted, etc.). |
81 |
78 |
|
I knew I could stop participating in the study at any time. |
79 |
75 |
|
I felt comfortable asking additional questions regarding the study. |
79 |
75 |
|
I was assured confidentiality of all personal information that I
provided, with the exception of those allowed by federal law. |
73 |
73 |
|
I felt secure that my confidentiality was protected throughout the
study. |
71 |
69 |
|
I was made aware of the benefits involved in participating in the
clinical research study. |
74 |
68 |
|
I was made aware of the risks involved in participating in the
clinical research study. |
74 |
65 |
|
I understood that I could choose other treatment options, including
no treatment at all. |
66 |
63 |
|
The informed consent document was easy to read and understand. |
60 |
61 |
Table 6
Overview of Informed Consent Process
Base: Have ever participated in a clinical research study
| |
% |
|
Said purpose of the study was "clear" after reading the
informed consent |
85 |
|
Agreed their questions were answered by the study team regarding the
informed consent process |
80 |
|
Said the study coordinator conducted the informed consent process. |
54 |
|
Read the informed consent by themselves |
48 |
Influences and Experiences of Former Participants
Participation in clinical studies appears to be a positive experience for
those involved. Most of those who participated in a study would do so again, if
given that chance (84%). Furthermore, a strong majority of participants (81%)
describe their appointments at the study site as "not at all
stressful."
Physicians play an important role in a person’s decision to participate in
a clinical research study. More than one-quarter (27%) of those who participated
in a study said that their physician was their main influence in deciding to
participate. Additionally, 79 percent of adults who are willing to participate
in a clinical research study with an unfamiliar physician or those who are not
sure indicate that they would be very or somewhat likely to check with their
regular physician before participating in a clinical research study he/she is
not conducting. Finally, nearly half (45%) of those who have ever participated
in a clinical research study indicate that they learned everything they needed
to know from the doctor/study team before deciding whether or not to
participate.
Table 7
Sources of Influence
Base: Have ever participated in a clinical study
| |
% |
|
Described their appointments at the study site as "Not at All
Stressful" |
81 |
| Main influence in the decision to participate in a clinical research
study: |
|
- No one other than myself
- Physician (PCP, Study Dr., Other Dr.)
|
|
|
Would be very or somewhat likely to consult with their regular
physician before agreeing to participate in a clinical research study that
he/she is not conducting. (Base: Those willing to participate in a
clinical research study with an unfamiliar physician or those who are not
sure) |
79 |
|
Said "I learned everything I need to know from the physician/study
team conducting the study" |
45 |
|
Said "I would participate in another clinical research study" |
84 |
Public Perceptions of Clinical Research Studies
Most adults agree that people who participate in clinical research studies
are making a contribution to science (86%), are part of an experiment to test
medications/treatments not already available to the public (79%), and
that they learn more about their condition and health in general (76%). Smaller
majorities agree that people who participate in studies have a chance to get
free medicine (65%) and do not have to pay for their medical care (53%). About
half of respondents agree that participants in clinical studies are taking a
gamble with their health (49%) and are treated like guinea pigs (46%).
Table 8
AGREE/DISAGREE WITH STATEMENTS ABOUT PEOPLE WHO PARTICIPATE IN
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES
"The following statements describe how some people feel
about clinical research studies. Using the scale below, please indicate how
strongly you agree or disagree with the statements below. People who participate
in clinical research studies…."
Percent saying "strongly agree" or "somewhat
agree"
Base: All Adults
| |
% |
|
Are making a contribution to science |
86 |
|
Are part of an experiment to test medications/treatments not already
available to the public |
79 |
|
Learn more about their condition and health in general |
76 |
|
Have a chance to get free medicine |
65 |
|
Do not have to pay for their medical care |
53 |
|
Are taking a gamble with their health |
49 |
|
Get the best possible treatment |
48 |
|
Are like guinea pigs |
46 |
|
Have access to the best physicians |
46 |
|
Spend a lot of time at the doctor's office |
34 |
|
Are part of an experiment to test medications/treatments already
available to the public |
33 |
The public sees the greatest risks to participating in clinical studies to be
possible side effects (47%) and health risks (32%) and sees the greatest
benefits as helping to advance science and find a cure for diseases/conditions
(36%) and helping to save lives (24%).
TABLE 9
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY RISKS
"Which of the following do you consider to be the greatest
risk of participating in a clinical research study?"
Base: All Adults
| |
% |
|
Possible side effects |
47 |
|
Health risks |
32 |
|
Unproven therapy |
9 |
|
Receiving a placebo(sugar pill) |
5 |
|
Privacy concerns |
2 |
|
Other |
1 |
|
None; I do not believe there are any risks. |
4 |
Note: Single-response question.
TABLE 10
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY BENEFITS
"Which of the following do you consider to be the greatest
benefit of clinical research studies?"
Base: All Adults
| |
% |
|
Help advance science and find a cure for diseases/conditions |
36 |
|
May help to save lives |
24 |
|
May help me with my condition |
17 |
|
Allow medical team to find a more effective treatment |
11 |
|
Monetary compensation (money) is provided |
4 |
|
Allows me to help others with the condition |
3 |
|
Provide information on current medications |
1 |
|
Free medication is provided |
1 |
|
Other |
1 |
|
None; I do not believe there are any benefits. |
2 |
Note: Single-response question.
Learn About Clinical Studies
While nearly two in five (38%) adults say the media is their main source of
receiving information about clinical research studies and most (83%) understand
what clinical research studies are, half (51%) of all adults indicate they would
prefer to learn about clinical research studies from their regular physician.
Table 11
Clinical Information Obtained
Base: All Adults
| |
2004 |
2005 |
| |
% |
% |
|
Understand what is meant by "clinical research study" also
known as "clinical trial" |
79 |
83 |
|
Media (TV, radio, newspaper, magazine) main source of receiving
information about clinical research studies |
44 |
38 |
|
Would prefer to learn about clinical research opportunities from their
regular/usual physician |
NA |
51 |
NA = Not Asked
Online Clinical Trial Registries
Initial reaction to online clinical trial registries is somewhat skeptical
with 20 percent of adults indicating they would be not at all likely to use the
service.
That said, majorities of respondents feel that all types of clinical trials
should be listed in the registries (73%) and that all results, regardless of
success, should be available in these registries (79%). There is mixed reaction
on how to present the results with 41 percent believing the results should be in
easy-to-understand layman’s terms and 34 percent believing they should be in
both layman’s terms and scientific terms. There is also no consensus on the
purpose of these registries although most ideas center on information sharing,
with 40 percent saying their purpose is to promote research, 36 percent saying
it is to increase awareness of clinical trials and 32 percent saying it is to
share experiences of clinical trials.
Table 12
Online Clinical Registry Reaction
Base: All Adults
| |
% |
|
Likelihood to use an online clinical trial registry:
- Extremely, very and fairly likely (Net)
- Not at all likely |
44
20 |
|
Think all types of clinical trials should be listed in the registries |
73 |
|
Think all clinical trial results, regardless of success, should be
available in these registries |
79 |
|
Results should be presented:
- Easy to understand layman’s terms
- Both laymen terms and in scientific terms
|
41
34 |
|
Primary Goals of Online Clinical Trial Registries:
- Promote Research
- Increase awareness of trials
- Share clinical trial experiences
- Central location tracking/ reviewing study results
- Resource to collect feedback from general population/professionals
|
|
Physician/Pharmaceutical Involvement in Clinical Research
Most people (72%) believe that physician interest in finding new and better
treatments is "very important" to physicians conducting clinical
research. Furthermore, 59 percent rated "patients who have no other
treatment alternatives" as "very important" to physicians
conducting clinical research.
Fewer people believe that fame and recognition (16%), getting a scientific
paper published (20%) or receiving money from drug companies (27%) are very
important to physicians conducting clinical research. These patterns are
consistent with 2004 results.
Table 13
Physician Involvement
"Please rate how important you think each of the
following is to physicians conducting clinical research."
(Percent saying "very important")
Base: All Adults
| |
2004 |
2005 |
| |
% |
% |
|
Finding new and better treatments |
80 |
72 |
|
Helping patients who have no other treatment alternatives |
NA |
59 |
|
Bringing fame and recognition to the physician’s medical center |
17 |
16 |
|
Getting a scientific paper published |
22 |
20 |
|
Receiving money from drug companies |
29 |
27 |
NA = Not Asked
A majority of respondents (62%) rate "receiving money from drug
sales" as "very important" to pharmaceutical companies conducting
clinical research while more than half (57%) believe that finding new and better
treatments is "very important" to pharmaceutical companies conducting
research studies.
Table 14
Pharmaceutical Involvement
"Please rate how important you think each of the
following is to pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical research."
(Percent saying "very important")
Base: All Adults
| |
% |
|
Receiving money from drug sales |
62 |
|
Finding new and better treatments |
57 |
|
Bringing fame and recognition to the pharmaceutical company |
47 |
|
Helping patients who have no other treatment alternatives |
38 |
|
Getting a scientific paper published |
29 |
Conclusions
Overall public opinion in relation to clinical research studies appears
similar to last year. However, there are a few very notable differences. There
is a slight reduction in the number of adults who have had the opportunity to
participate in clinical research studies. The allure of financial benefits
appears to be less of a draw to both those who have participated in the past and
those who are considering it in the future. For those who have participated in
clinical research studies, the involvement of their physician appears to be
important. Public perceptions of clinical research studies remain similar to
past years and the public is still gathering most of their information from the
media. The public appears skeptical to the initial introduction of online
clinical trial registries for themselves, but they are open to the information
sharing they could provide.
Downloadable PDFs of the Harris Interactive Healthcare News are
available at http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters_healthcare.asp
Methodology
This survey was conducted online within the United States
between April 19 and 26, 2005 among a nationwide cross
section of 2,261 adults (aged 18 and over). Data were weighted for age,
education, income, gender, race/ethnicity and region where necessary to bring
them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score
weighting was also used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.
In theory, with probability samples of this size, one could say with 95
percent certainty that the results from the total sample have a sampling
error of plus or minus 3 percentage points of what they would
be if the entire U.S. adult population had been polled
with complete accuracy. Sampling error for the sub-samples of those who
have participated in a clinical research study (261), those who would consider
participating in a clinical research study (1,525), and those willing to
participate in a clinical research study with an unfamiliar physician or those
who are not sure (2,118) is higher and varies. Unfortunately, there are several
other possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more
serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include refusals
to be interviewed (nonresponse), question wording and question order, and
weighting. It is impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these
factors. These online samples were not probability samples.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National
Council on Public Polls.
About Harris Interactive®
Harris Interactive Inc. (www.harrisinteractive.com), the 15th
largest and fastest-growing market research firm in the world, is a Rochester,
NY-based global research company that blends premier strategic consulting
with innovative and efficient methods of investigation, analysis and
application. Known for The Harris Poll® and for pioneering
Internet-based research methods, Harris Interactive conducts proprietary and
public research to help its clients achieve clear, material and enduring
results.
Harris Interactive combines its intellectual capital, databases and
technology to advance market leadership through its U.S. offices and wholly
owned subsidiaries, HI Europe in London (www.hieurope.com), Novatris in Paris (www.novatris.com),
and through an independent global network of affiliate market research
companies. EOE M/F/D/V.
To become a member of the Harris Poll OnlineSM and be invited to
participate in future online surveys, www.harrispollonline.com.
Press Contacts:
Nancy Wong
Harris Interactive
585-214-7316
Kelly Gullo
Harris Interactive
585-214-7172
|